Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,189 vetted Board decisions in 2024.
The Board found that the retroactive reduction in VA disability compensation due to removal of a dependent spouse, effective July 1, 1997, created a valid debt. The Veteran's claim was denied as there was no evidence of an error in notification or assistance provided by VA.
The Board has denied service connection for nosebleeds, finding that the current condition is not related to service and there is no evidence of a nexus between the in-service exposure and the current symptoms.
The Board dismissed the appeal for an earlier effective date for service connection of degenerative myopia of the left eye due to the Veteran's death and lack of a validly substituted party.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for a left elbow condition and left leg numbness have been granted in full prior to the promulgation of this decision.,As such, these claims are now moot.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected torn medial meniscus, finding that the evidence does not support a higher rating under Diagnostic Code 5258.
The Board has remanded the cases of service connection for dental and eye conditions due to insufficient evidence in the record. The Veteran's exposure to jet fuel is conceded, but a new medical opinion is needed to determine if his current disabilities are related to this exposure.
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for service connection for chronic prostatitis, finding that his symptoms began during active duty and have continued since then. The decision is based on the continuity of symptomatology and the medical evidence linking the current condition to service.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a lack of information regarding the Veteran's employment status, and requests that her employment records from Hawaii Department of Education be obtained for verification.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), finding that there is no evidence of a nexus between his current BPH and his active duty service, including exposure to herbicide agents. The Board concluded that the Veteran did not meet the criteria for service connection as his BPH was neither present in service nor related to any injury or disease incurred during service.
The Veteran's claim for a higher level of special monthly compensation (SMC) is being remanded due to the VA not obtaining relevant private treatment records that could have impacted the decision.
The Board has remanded the case due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error regarding pulmonary function tests (PFTs). A new examination is necessary to assess the current severity of the Veteran's service-connected restrictive lung disease.
The Veteran withdrew his appeal through his authorized representative, attorney K.K., before the Board could make a decision.
The Board denied service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, finding that there is no evidence to support a link between his service-connected disabilities and his causes of death.
Your claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) from May 22, 2017 to May 4, 2020 has been granted. This dismissal means there is no longer an issue to be decided by the Board.
The Veteran's appeals for higher ratings for his right hip replacement and left hip disability have been denied. The Board found that the evidence did not meet the criteria for a rating higher than 50 percent for right hip replacement or for a compensable rating for limitation of extension of the left hip.
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed because he did not identify a specific decision date or issue for review.
The Board has determined that the overpayment was improperly created due to undue procrastination by the AOJ, and therefore dismissed the Veteran's waiver claim as moot.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a duodenal ulcer (also claimed as peptic ulcer disease) because no new and relevant evidence was submitted to reopen the claim.
The appeal of the issue of entitlement to service connection for urinary tract infection has been dismissed due to the Appellant's withdrawal.
The Veteran's BPH is being remanded for a VA medical opinion to consider direct service connection and secondary service connection based on aggravation, as well as the combined synergistic effect of his total potential toxic exposure in service.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.