Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,189 vetted Board decisions in 2024.
The appeal for survivors' pension and DIC has been dismissed as the appellant withdrew her request.
The Board has found the VA examinations to be inadequate and remanded for a new examination to determine the current severity of the Veteran's right eye condition, including whether it is solely due to his service-connected right eye epiretinal membrane. The issues are inextricably intertwined with the TDIU claim.
The Board dismissed the appeal due to the Veteran's death, and no new evidence was provided for the left knee disability claim.
The appeal is dismissed because there is no VA determination denying the benefits sought, and the Veteran has not provided the required EOBs from his non-VA insurer.
The Veteran's right breast fibroadenoma and scar status-post excision with residual pain are currently rated as noncompensable. The case is remanded to determine if the Veteran's scars meet the criteria for a compensable rating under Diagnostic Code 7804.
The Board has decided to remand the claim due to a duty-to-assist error in obtaining an adequate medical opinion, and the need for further examination.
The Board has dismissed the appeals as the underlying non-VA care was approved for payment and these claims were resolved by administrative action.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty to assist error and requires an examination to determine the nature and etiology of any current disability manifested by syncope.
The Veteran's effective date for additional dependency compensation due to recognition of C.M. as his helpless child is granted on November 17, 2020.
The Board has determined there are errors in the recoupment of separation pay and requires further investigation to determine the correct amount, if any funds were withheld, and how much was returned.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty to assist error and requires an examination to determine the nature and etiology of any current disability manifested by syncope.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a pre-decisional error regarding where the Veteran resided since June 1, 2017. The AOJ needs to determine this and adjust the benefits accordingly.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for Raynaud's syndrome is granted with an effective date of May 28, 2014.
The appeal for TDIU is dismissed due to the Veteran's death.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty to assist error and requires an examination to determine the nature and etiology of any current disability manifested by syncope.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty to assist error and requires an examination for syncope.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty to assist error and requires an examination to determine the nature and etiology of any current disability manifested by syncope.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty to assist error and requires an examination to determine the nature and etiology of any current disability manifested by syncope.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty to assist error and requires an examination to determine the nature and etiology of any current disability manifested by syncope.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty to assist error and requires an examination to determine the nature and etiology of any current disability manifested by syncope.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.