Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,189 vetted Board decisions in 2024.
The Veteran withdrew his appeal, and the Board dismissed it.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. §1151 due to a lack of evidence showing that his bowel/fecal incontinence was caused by VA care and treatment following an August 9, 2000 hemorrhoidectomy.
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for ovarian cysts is being remanded due to the inadequacy of the previous examination and the need for a comprehensive evaluation.
The Board has remanded the claims for entitlement to payment or reimbursement of beneficiary travel benefits related to three episodes of care on October 4, 2023 and two occurrences on October 17, 2023 due to insufficient evidence in the record.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for left foot and right foot calcaneal spurs, finding that there was no evidence of a nexus between the current disabilities and active-duty service.
The appeal for enhanced DIC rates has been dismissed as the benefits have already been granted in an April 2023 rating decision.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a spine disability, to include as secondary to service-connected right knee disability, is remanded due to the need for additional medical opinions. The case will be referred to an appropriate VA examiner(s) for addendum opinions addressing the etiology of the diagnosed spine disability and whether it is at least as likely as not caused or aggravated by his service-connected right knee disability.
The Veteran withdrew his appeal for benefits under VA's Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC). The Board dismissed the appeal as a result.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's exposure to herbicide agents on Wake Island during his service, and for obtaining complete treatment records from Dr. Richard Spitzer.
The Board has determined that the July 2024 decision on appeal is legally inadequate and remanded for a new medical determination considering all medical information of record.
The Board has remanded the cases for further examination and medical opinions regarding service connection for right and left index finger disorders. The TDIU issue is also inextricably intertwined with the service connection issues.
The Veteran's keratoconus is currently rated as 20 percent disabling, and the Board finds that his symptoms do not warrant a higher rating.
The Board has granted service connection for congenital spondylolisthesis, L-5 as it is related to the condition shown in active service and not clearly and unmistakably not aggravated during service.
The Veteran's left and right foot gout are both rated at a 30 percent disability rating, effective from July 18, 2024.
The Board granted the Veteran's waiver of recovery of overpayment of VA compensation benefits in the amount of $2,873.02 due to financial hardship and found that recovery would not defeat the purpose of the benefit.
The Board dismissed the appeal as the VA AOJ had already administratively approved payment for non-VA medical care provided on November 3, 2019.
The Veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 50 percent for panic disorder with alcohol use disorder is being remanded due to a lack of clinical documentation from his pain management doctor.
The Board has dismissed the appeal as the appellant withdrew his request for a compensable rating for a ventral hernia disability.
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating and earlier effective date for service connection were both denied. The Board found that the Veteran is not entitled to a higher rating under current criteria, but is eligible for a separate compensable rating of 50 percent under DC 7203 (2023). The effective date was also denied as it was properly assigned based on the date of receipt of the claim.
The Veteran's request for reimbursement of the cost associated with a Project Management Professional (PMP) certification examination on January 24, 2020 is denied as he did not meet the eligibility criteria set by VA.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.