Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,189 vetted Board decisions in 2024.
The appeal was dismissed due to the appellant's death. The Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this appeal at this time.
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for a 60% rating for herpes with incidental finding of condyloma vulgaris is denied as there was no increase in disability during the one-year period prior to her May 2015 claim, and the June 2009 decision granting service connection was final.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to errors in calculating the Veteran's overpayment and the validity of the debt. The RO must complete the necessary development related to the calculation of the Veteran's compensation debt, including considering the amount paid by DFAS for his drill days.
The Board dismissed the appeal as the appellant requested withdrawal of all issues.
The Veteran's appeal of the July 2020 electronic correspondence was dismissed because it was premature and did not meet the requirements for an appeal under VA regulations.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a failure to obtain a VA examination for the Veteran's pancreatic cancer, which may be related to his service.
The Veteran and his former attorney have withdrawn their appeals for earlier effective dates related to TDIU, SMC housebound status, and DEA eligibility. The Board has dismissed these matters.
The Board has determined that the November 2023 decision on appeal approving PCAFC benefits at Level 1 is legally inadequate and requires further development to determine if the Veteran meets the criteria for a Level 2 stipend.
The Board has decided to remand the claims for service connection for atrial fibrillation and cardiomyopathy due to insufficient evidence of a nexus between these conditions and service. The Veteran's symptoms, including his atrial fibrillation, are believed to have started during or be related to his active duty.
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claim for service connection of his right inguinal hernia as secondary to his service-connected adjustment disorder with anxiety and major depressive disorder due to insufficient medical opinion regarding whether the hernia was caused by or aggravated by his mental health condition.
The Board dismissed the appeal of entitlement to beneficiary travel payment for expenses incurred driving to and from a VA healthcare appointment on June 17, 2019.
The Veteran's annual clothing allowance applications for calendar years 2019 and 2020 were approved in July 2020, making the appeal moot.
The appeal was dismissed because the Veteran withdrew it before a decision could be made.
The Veteran's appeal for benefits under the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) was dismissed because the accredited representative withdrew the appeal.
The Veteran's eligibility for PCAFC benefits is being remanded due to inadequate notice in the initial decision, and the need to correct the error based on a new judicial ruling.
The Veteran's application for PCAFC benefits was denied due to lack of personal care services and need for supervision. The Board has decided to remand the case for further review, including an adequate medical opinion and proper notification.
The appeal for basic eligibility for VA home loan guaranty benefits has been dismissed as the benefit was already granted.
The Board has granted service connection for left hip arthritis and right hip arthritis, finding that the Veteran's current conditions arose within a year of separation from active service.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for a new medical opinion regarding the cause of death and the etiology of the Veteran's cardiomyopathy. The appellant is seeking an examination by a specialist in psychiatric conditions, as well as clarification on the use of IV drugs and Dalmane.
The Veteran withdrew their appeal for this issue before the Board could make a decision.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.