Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,189 vetted Board decisions in 2024.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for accrued benefits as she did not meet the statutory definition of a child and could only qualify if she provided evidence that she bore the expense of the Veteran's last sickness or burial. The appellant failed to provide such evidence.
The Veteran's clothing allowance claims are remanded due to missing relevant documents from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). The AOJ needs to reconstruct and associate all pertinent records with her electronic claims file.
The appeal is dismissed due to the death of the appellant, and no effective date earlier than April 6, 2016, for the grant of special monthly pension based on aid and attendance.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for hepatic steatosis as there is no current diagnosis of this condition in his medical records and it is not associated with his military service.
The Board denied the Appellant's claim for survivor's pension because her income exceeded the maximum allowable limit set by law.
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete actions on remand and additional evidence needs to be considered. The Veteran is asked to provide a statement from his military supervisor regarding his retirement and a doctor's statement about his right hip condition.
The Board has determined that the reductions in ratings for service-connected large B cell lymphoma were improper and void ab initio, thus restoring the original 100% ratings effective September 1, 2014.
The Board has found that new medical opinions are needed to determine if the Veteran's bilateral foot disabilities and hammertoes of the left foot are related to his military service. The case is being remanded for this purpose.
The Veteran's appeal to establish a compensable evaluation for postoperative excision nodular neoplasm fasciitis of the left neck is remanded due to issues with the timeliness of his substantive appeal. A new VA examination will be scheduled to assess the current severity of his service-connected condition.
The Veteran's claim for service connection of a chronic inguinal condition is remanded due to the need for an in-person examination and opinion regarding the etiology of his claimed disability.
The Board found that the overpayment of VA educational assistance benefits was due to administrative error by DoD, and thus dismissed the appeal as moot.
The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings for bilateral elbow, lumbar spine, right knee, and left knee disabilities are remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations.
The Board denied the overpayment of VA compensation benefits, finding that the creation and validity of the overpayment were proper based on the death of the Veteran's spouse.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the Veteran's central auditory processing disorder and traumatic brain injury evaluations. The claim will be further evaluated after obtaining necessary testing.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for an eyesight disability other than dry eye syndrome, including nuclear cataract, finding that there is no evidence to support a relationship between his current eye disabilities and active service.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for a disability rating for his service-connected respiratory condition and for service connection for cataracts due to inadequate examinations and opinions.
The Veteran withdrew their appeal, so the case is dismissed.
The Veteran's dysphonia disability is currently rated at 10 percent, and the Board has decided to remand this issue for further development.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for idiopathic interstitial lung disease with pulmonary fibrosis is granted. The issue of entitlement to total disability due to individual unemployability (TDIU) is remanded.
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to their death, and no jurisdiction remains for the Board to adjudicate the merits of this case.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.