Other conditions decisions — 2025
23,506 indexed Board decisions in 2025.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2025
The Board denied the Veteran's appeal for payment of expenses for a non-VA COVID-19 test performed on August 27, 2021, as it was not authorized by VA.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2025
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an allowance for an automobile or other conveyance and adaptive equipment due to a lack of service-connected disabilities meeting the criteria.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2025
The appeal for payment or reimbursement of non-VA medical services provided on April 2, 2020, was dismissed due to the improper claimant filing a VA Form 10182.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2025
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for revision of an August 2006 rating decision based on clear and unmistakable error (CUE) regarding the initial 10 percent ratings assigned for residuals of undifferentiated seronegative spondyloarthropathy involving both shoulders.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2025
The Board remands the appeal to the AOJ for correction of an error related to obtaining relevant records from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA), specifically the hearing transcripts.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2025
The Board remands the claims for service connection for actinic keratosis, abnormal aortic valve, abdominal pain, and acute deep venous thrombosis due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error in affording the Veteran a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2025
The appeal was withdrawn by the Veteran before a decision was made.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2025
The Board remands the claim for a VA aid and attendance examination to correct a duty-to-assist error.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2025
The Board denied an initial disability rating in excess of 30 percent for the Veteran's service-connected adjustment disorder with depressed mood and denied an effective date prior to March 8, 2016, for the award of special monthly compensation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2025
The Board remands the claims for service connection for right and left foot hallux valgus to obtain an adequate medical opinion addressing secondary service connection theories.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2025
The Veteran was granted a total disability evaluation due to individual unemployability (TDIU) as her service-connected disabilities prevented her from securing and following substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2025
The appeal for payment or reimbursement of non-VA medical services was dismissed due to the improper claimant.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2025
The Board granted a 10 percent rating for anosmia based on the complete loss of sense of smell related to service-connected sinusitis and rhinitis.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2025
The claim for reimbursement of the cost of non-VA medical care provided by ESC and HEC through the VCCP was dismissed as there is no determination by VA on the matter, and the process for payment in the VCCP does not allow for Board review.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2025
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for education benefits under Chapter 33 (Post-9/11 GI Bill) in excess of 60 percent due to his qualifying active service not meeting the required duration.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2025
The Board denied the appeal for an increased disability evaluation in excess of 40 percent for right thigh incisional hernia status post fasciotomy (Muscle Group XIV).
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2025
The Board denied the Veteran's appeal for a higher level of special monthly compensation (SMC) based on the need for regular aid and attendance, finding that he does not have any additional disabilities independently rated at 50 percent or more.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2025
The Board remands the issue of eligibility for benefits under the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error, including an inadequate medical opinion.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2025
The Board granted service connection for gout and arthritis, finding that the Veteran's condition is related to his active military service.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2025
The appeal was dismissed as the issue on appeal was resolved by administrative action, and there remains no allegation of error of fact or law concerning the issue.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.