Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
23,506 vetted Board decisions in 2025.
The appeal for TDIU prior to March 10, 2020 was dismissed due to prohibited concurrent review.
The Veteran has withdrawn the appeal for earlier effective dates and basic eligibility for DEA benefits.
The Board remands the claim to provide an accounting for the missed payment due to IT modernization and explain the discrepancy between the monthly premium and the amount requested for remittance or placed as a non-interest lien.
The appeal was dismissed as it was premature and the proposal to adjust the withholding of VA disability compensation benefits for FYs 2016, 2017, and 2018 was not ripe for appeal.
The Board remands the matter to correct a pre-decisional duty to assist error and obtain additional development to ensure that the Veteran did return to active duty and received VA compensation.
The appeal for payment or reimbursement of non-VA medical services provided on May 3, 2021, was dismissed due to the improper claimant filing a VA Form 10182.
The Board denied service connection for insomnia as it is subsumed under the Veteran's already service-connected PTSD diagnosis.
The Board granted service connection for temporomandibular disorder with crepitus and jaw deviation on opening, finding that the condition began during active service.
The Board granted initial ratings of 20 percent for varicose veins in both lower extremities effective November 17, 2014, and a rating of 40 percent from December 13, 2017, to January 21, 2022.
The Board remands the claims for a retrospective evaluation of coronary artery disease and TDIU due to conflicting medical evidence.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for memory loss and hair loss.
The Board remands the matter to formally adjudicate whether the $31,389.08 overpayment was validly created due to a potential administrative error.
The Veteran withdrew the appeal in its entirety, and the Board has no jurisdiction to review it.
Eligibility for benefits under the PCAFC is granted based on the Veteran's inability to perform activities of daily living.
The appeal for payment of non-VA medical expenses incurred on September 7, 2021, was denied due to lack of VA authorization.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for basic eligibility for education benefits under 38 U.S.C. Chapter 33 due to a general discharge under honorable conditions.
The Board denied service connection for an acquired psychiatric disability, finding that the veteran's condition had its onset during a period of INACDUTRA and did not result from an injury incurred during this time.
The Board remands the claim for a VA medical opinion to address whether the Veteran's gastritis is related to service or caused/aggravated by his service-connected disabilities.
The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the eligibility for benefits under VA's Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers.
The appeal concerning the payment of non-VA medical services was dismissed as the Board does not have legal authority to decide it.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.