Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
23,506 vetted Board decisions in 2025.
The Board remands the case for a legally adequate medical decision regarding eligibility for a higher level stipend under VA's Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC).
The Board granted a 10 percent evaluation for left hip strain (limitation of adduction) but denied evaluations in excess of 10 percent for limitation of flexion and extension.
The Board remands the claim for a neck disorder to obtain an adequate medical opinion.
The Board remands the case to obtain an addendum opinion addressing the conflicting diagnoses and their etiology.
The appeal regarding eligibility for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA's) Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers was withdrawn by the Veteran and his significant other.
The Board granted service connection for a right hip labral tear disability, finding that the condition began during active duty and continued after service.
The Veteran withdrew the appeal regarding entitlement to a compensable rating for headaches prior to July 17, 2024, an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for a scar of the neck, and entitlement to TDIU.
The Veteran's TDIU was granted effective November 24, 2020, due to his service-connected diabetic peripheral neuropathy preventing him from obtaining and maintaining substantially gainful employment.
The Board denied the Veteran's eligibility for enrollment in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) as he was found to be independent and capable of performing all activities of daily living without assistance.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on aid and attendance, as his service-connected disabilities do not render him unable to care for his daily needs without requiring regular aid and attendance of another person.
The appeal seeking an apportionment of the Veteran's VA disability compensation to the appellant, on behalf of A.G., the non-minor child, is remanded for further development.
The veteran withdrew the appeal regarding his cervical strain, bilateral upper extremity radiculopathy, and left foot.
The Board denied an earlier effective date for the award of a TDIU, finding that the Veteran's claim was received on December 27, 2022, and it was not factually ascertainable that he became unemployable due to his service-connected disabilities within one year prior to this date.
The Veteran was granted a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities from March 10, 2023, to June 26, 2023.
The appeal for eligibility for benefits under the VA's PCAFC is remanded due to a pre-decisional duty-to-assist error.
The appeal for eligibility to continue enrollment in the PCAFC is dismissed as moot.
The Board granted restoration of the 20 percent rating for bilateral dry eye syndrome effective February 1, 2025, and an earlier effective date of September 9, 2021, for service connection.
The Board found clear and unmistakable error (CUE) in the July 2021 rating decision that granted SMC at the (l) rate, and affirmed the reduction to the (s) rate effective June 1, 2023.
The appeal for eligibility to continue enrollment in the PCAFC is dismissed as moot due to an extension of eligibility for legacy participants.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for a 40 percent rating for his lumbar spine disability, entitlement to a TDIU, and basic eligibility for DEA benefits.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.