Other conditions decisions — 2025
23,506 indexed Board decisions in 2025.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2025
The Board denied a higher rating for the veteran's foot conditions, stating that the maximum schedular rating has already been assigned.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2025
The veteran's appeal for Total Disability Individual Unemployability (TDIU) based on service-connected disabilities was granted. The decision is effective from August 10, 2012.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2025
The Board remanded the claim for an earlier effective date for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on aid and attendance. The decision is deferred until the AOJ assigns an effective date for the Veteran's service-connected loss of use of his right hand.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2025
The veteran's appeal was dismissed because they requested to withdraw it.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJanuary 2025
The veteran is granted special monthly compensation (SMC) based on the need for aid and attendance. The claim for SMC based at the housebound rate is dismissed.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2025
The appeal regarding VR&E benefits was dismissed because the veteran was granted these benefits during the pendency of the appeal.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2025
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities require regular aid and attendance, so the claim for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on aid and attendance is granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2025
The veteran's dependent daughter is granted retroactive educational assistance benefits starting from October 2011, subject to the laws and regulations governing the payment of monetary benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2025
The veteran's spouse was denied a survivor's pension because her income exceeded the maximum annual pension rate.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2025
The Board granted eligibility to attorney fees based on past-due benefits awarded in a January 2023 rating decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2025
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an effective date earlier than April 2, 2021, for a 70 percent rating for their service-connected other specified trauma or stressor-related disorder. The decision was based on the evidence showing that the veteran's symptoms did not warrant a higher rating before that date.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2025
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for TDIU, stating that no formal or informal claim for TDIU was received within the year prior to July 18, 2012.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2025
The appeal to restore the Veteran's dependent spouse and children to his VA disability compensation was dismissed as moot because the benefits were already restored.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2025
The appeal for service connection of gastritis was dismissed because the VA had already granted service connection for this condition in a previous decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2025
The Board denied the Veteran's appeal to apportion $900.00 of his monthly VA benefits to W.C. on behalf of C.C.C., finding that the initial decision was proper.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJanuary 2025
The veteran's claim for a 20 percent rating for right hip flexion was granted, but higher ratings and other claims were denied.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2025
The appeal for payment of non-VA medical services through VA's Community Care program was dismissed because it is subject to a specific administrative dispute resolution process that does not allow for appellate review by the Board of Veterans' Appeals.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2025
The Board granted service connection for Crohn's disease, finding it directly related to environmental exposures during the veteran's service in Afghanistan.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2025
The Board denied the veteran's request for Higher-Level Review because it was not valid. The veteran did not file a proper claim form.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2025
The Board remanded the case to correct errors in the medical determination of eligibility for VA's Caregivers Program.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.