Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
23,506 vetted Board decisions in 2025.
The Veteran's application for eligibility to enroll in the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) was denied because his period of active service does not meet the eligibility criteria.
The appeal for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death was dismissed because the benefit sought has been granted in full.
The Board granted an earlier effective date of August 3, 2021, for the grant of entitlement to service connection for erectile dysfunction and special monthly compensation based on loss of use of a creative organ.
The Board denied the Veteran's appeal for eligibility to enroll in the PCAFC, finding that she did not have a serious injury incurred or aggravated in the line of duty on or after September 11, 2001.
The appeal regarding eligibility to enroll in the Department of Veterans Affairs Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) is remanded due to errors in the initial decision and a need to further process the claim.
The Board made a favorable finding that the Veteran has a need for personal care services based on an inability to perform activities of daily living and a need for supervision or protection, but remanded the claim for further evaluation by the AOJ.
The Board remands the issue of eligibility for benefits under the PCAFC to correct errors that occurred prior to the April 2021 VHA decision, including inadequate notice and an inadequate medical opinion.
The Board granted an earlier effective date of May 16, 2022, for service connection for female sexual arousal disorder and special monthly compensation for the loss of use of a creative organ but denied a higher initial rating for dysmenorrhea associated with ovarian dysfunction with menometrorrhagia.
The appeal concerning entitlement to eligibility for PCAFC is remanded due to a lack of proper notification and medical evidence.
The Board remands the appeal concerning eligibility for enrollment in the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) to obtain an opinion on whether it is in the best interest of the Veteran to participate in the program and provide complete notice as required by law.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for initial compensable disability ratings for his service-connected right hip conditions, including impairment of thigh and limitation of flexion.
The Board remands the Veteran's claim for eligibility to enroll in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)'s Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) due to a lack of sufficient medical evidence and clear reasoning.
The appeal for an earlier effective date than September 13, 2017 for SMC based on housebound status is dismissed. The criteria for SMC based on a regular need for aid and attendance prior to February 6, 2023 have not been met.
The Board remands the claim for service connection for missing teeth (teeth 6, 7, 8) to obtain a medical opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's missing teeth.
The Board denied service connection for basal cell carcinoma, finding that new and relevant evidence did not establish a direct link between the Veteran's active duty service and his diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma.
The Board denied the Appellant's claim for recognition as the Veteran's surviving spouse, which would have allowed her to receive VA benefits such as survivors' pension, DIC, and accrued benefits.
The Veteran is granted a higher level of special monthly compensation (SMC) based on the need for special aid and attendance with a higher level of care.
The Board denied service connection for severe pancreatic insufficiency as the condition was not shown to be chronic in service, did not manifest within the applicable presumptive period, and there was no evidence of a causal relationship between the current disability and an in-service injury or disease.
The appeal was dismissed due to the death of the Veteran's surviving spouse during the pendency of the appeal.
The Board remands the matter for a VA medical opinion to determine the likely etiology of the Veteran's nasopharyngeal cancer, including whether it is related to his service or exposure to herbicide agents.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.