Other conditions decisions — 2025
23,506 indexed Board decisions in 2025.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2025
The Board granted an effective date of September 16, 2003, for the grant of service connection for mood disorder due to known physiological condition with depressive features.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2025
The appeal for entitlement to specially adapted housing was dismissed due to a concurrent election of review under different appeal lanes. The claim for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on aid and attendance/housebound status is remanded for further action.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2025
The Board remands the claim for a medical opinion to determine if the Veteran meets eligibility criteria for PCAFC benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2025
The Board remands the appeal to obtain a medical opinion from CEAT regarding the Veteran's eligibility for PCAFC benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2025
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for retroperitoneal carcinoma, finding no current diagnosis of the condition and insufficient evidence linking it to herbicide exposure during service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2025
The Board remands the claim for service connection for blood clots to afford the Veteran a VA examination and obtain a medical opinion regarding the etiology of his condition, as he has a history of lower extremity blood clots and participated in toxic exposure risk activities during service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2025
The appeal for eligibility to enroll into the VA's Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) is remanded due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error, specifically an inadequate medical decision regarding the Veteran's need for personal care services.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2025
The Board denied service connection for periodontal disease (claimed as mucogingival defect with recession) for compensation purposes, finding no current dental disorder for which VA disability compensation is payable.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2025
The Board remands the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death due to an inadequate VA medical opinion and a need for additional evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2025
The Board denied service connection for hepatocellular carcinoma as the evidence did not support a link to in-service exposure or injury.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2025
The Board denied increased ratings for the veteran's right hip conditions, finding that the current disability levels did not warrant higher ratings under applicable diagnostic codes.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2025
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates and higher initial ratings for periodic limb disorder of both lower extremities, finding no basis to support an earlier effective date or a higher rating based on the evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2025
The Board remands the claim for service connection for status-post total vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy due to an inadequate medical opinion.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2025
The Board remands the claims for a retrospective medical opinion to evaluate the severity of the service-connected ruptured intervertebral disc status post laminectomy and to determine if special monthly compensation is warranted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2025
The appeal is remanded to request updated financial information and verify income sources for the Veteran and his former spouse, as well as to address any discrepancies regarding child support payments and Social Security benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2025
The Board remands the issue of eligibility for benefits under VA's PCAFC due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error, requiring a legally adequate medical opinion from the CEAT.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2025
The Board granted service connection for pancreatic cancer, finding that the evidence is in equipoise regarding whether the Veteran's condition was due to his in-service exposure to toxic and environmental hazards.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2025
The Board remands the claim for a new Centralized Eligibility and Appeals Team (CEAT) determination to assess the Veteran's eligibility for enrollment in the Department of Veterans Affairs Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2025
The appeal for eligibility for PCAFC benefits was denied due to the death of the Veteran, as the application requirements could not be completed.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2025
The appeal for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) has been withdrawn by the appellant.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.