Other conditions decisions — 2025
23,506 indexed Board decisions in 2025.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2025
The Board remands the matter to clarify whether the right shoulder surgery on July 17, 2024, was authorized for payment by VA and/or Optum.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2025
The Board remands the issue of eligibility for PCAFC due to pre-decisional duty to assist errors, including an inadequate medical opinion and insufficient notice.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2025
The Veteran withdrew the appeal for service connection for bladder cancer during a hearing, and the Board has no jurisdiction to review this issue.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2025
The Board granted an effective date of May 22, 2024, for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU), but not earlier.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2025
The appeal regarding the proposed reduction of bilateral tinea pedis from 10 percent to 0 percent disabling was dismissed due to no response within the required timeframe.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedDecember 2025
The Board granted a 30 percent rating for reactive airway disorder and denied service connection for a right hand disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2025
The Board remands the case to obtain a medical opinion regarding eligibility for benefits under VA's Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC).
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2025
The Board remands the claims for service connection for urinary frequency and a prostate disorder due to inadequate medical evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2025
The Board denied service connection for colon cancer as the evidence did not support a link between the Veteran's current condition and their in-service toxic exposure risk activity.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2025
The Board denied a compensable evaluation for hairy cell leukemia with hypogammaglobulinemia from August 24, 2024, as the Veteran's condition was found to be asymptomatic and in Rai Stage 0.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2025
The appeal was denied as the reduction in the Veteran's nonservice-connected pension by the amount of his monthly Social Security benefit from October 2012 through November 2024 was found to be proper.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2025
The Veteran withdrew the appeal for service connection for type II diabetes mellitus before the Board made a decision.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2025
The Board granted a separate rating for the Veteran's other specified insomnia disorder, finding it to be a distinct disability due to tinnitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2025
The Board remands the claim for a new medical opinion and to obtain private treatment records, as the December 2021 CEAT decision was found inadequate.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2025
The Board granted an initial 30 percent rating for the service-connected right lip condition, but no higher.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2025
The Board remands the issue of entitlement to service connection for a right hip disorder for further development, specifically requiring an addendum medical opinion from a VA doctor.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2025
The Board denied service connection for an eye disability, as there was no evidence of a current disability related to symptoms of blurriness and watery eyes during the appeal period.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2025
The Board denied service connection for a colon disorder as the evidence did not support a finding that the Veteran's diagnosed resection of small intestine, mesenteric ischemic thrombosis, and sigmoid colon ischemic colitis were related to his active military service or superimposed on a pre-existing disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2025
The Board denied apportionment of the Veteran's VA disability compensation for both periods due to a finding that the Veteran reasonably discharged his support responsibilities and an apportionment would result in undue hardship.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2025
The Board denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) as the evidence did not show that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities rendered him unable to secure or maintain substantially gainful employment.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.