Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
23,506 vetted Board decisions in 2025.
The appeal as to whether the September 13, 2024 request for higher-level review was timely received in response to a July 1, 2024 VA decisional letter is granted.
The appeal for eligibility to continue enrollment in the PCAFC is dismissed as moot due to an extension of eligibility for legacy participants.
The appeal is remanded due to inadequate notification and medical decision-making regarding eligibility for the VA's Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC).
The Board remands the issue of eligibility for enrollment in the PCAFC due to an inadequate rationale provided by the July 2023 VA Caregiver Support decision.
The Board denied increased ratings for the Veteran's left and right hip disabilities, except for a 10 percent rating from March 11, 2024, for both hips.
The Veteran was granted a Level 2 stipend under the PCAFC for the period prior to his death, as he required personal care services each time he completed three or more activities of daily living and was fully dependent on a caregiver.
The Board remands the case for a new medical determination to correct a pre-decisional duty to assist error.
The Board denied an effective date earlier than October 17, 2022, for the award of a total disability rating for individual unemployability due to service-connected disability (TDIU).
The Board remands the claim for a more detailed medical opinion to determine eligibility for the VA Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC).
The Board remands the matter to obtain a medical opinion regarding the Veteran's eligibility for benefits under the VA Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC).
The appeal was dismissed due to the Veteran's death during the pendency of the appeal.
The Board dismissed the appeal concerning whether it was proper to remove S. from the Veteran's award as a dependent child effective December 1, 2023.
The Board remands the issue of entitlement to an apportionment of the Veteran's VA disability compensation benefits for further development and adjudication.
The appeal for an allowance for an automobile or other conveyance and/or automobile adaptive equipment is dismissed as the claim has been resolved by a full grant in an October 2025 rating decision.
The appeal was dismissed due to a procedural defect in compliance with claims-processing rules.
The Board denied a rating greater than 10 percent for residuals of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and denied higher level special monthly compensation based on complete organic aphonia, but granted SMC based on the need for aid and attendance.
The Board remands the claim for an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) to correct a pre-decisional duty to assist error.
The appeal for an earlier effective date for the award of TDIU was dismissed as the Veteran cannot challenge the merits of a Board decision by expressing disagreement with an implementing AOJ rating decision.
The case is remanded to adjudicate the contentions in the Veteran's CUE motion regarding an April 26, 1968 rating decision.
The Veteran withdrew all appeals listed on the September 17, 2025 Decision Review Request: Board Appeal (Notice of Disagreement) (NOD).
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.