Other conditions decisions — 2025
23,506 indexed Board decisions in 2025.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2025
The Board remands the issue of whether the withholding of VA disability compensation to recoup special separation benefits in the after-tax amount of $38,680.78 was proper for a paid and due audit.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2025
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating to 100 percent for squamous cell carcinoma, right true vocal cord, was granted effective July 24, 2017.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2025
The Veteran withdrew the appeal for earlier effective dates and an increased rating for PTSD, TDIU, SMC, DEA, and a total rating for compensation based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2025
The Board granted an effective date of January 10, 2019, for the 10 percent evaluation of right hip limitation of extension, the 20 percent evaluation of right hip thigh impairment, and the 10 percent evaluation of right hip limitation of flexion.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2025
The appeal was dismissed due to the Veteran's death, as claims do not survive a veteran's death.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2025
The Board of Veterans' Appeals denied the Veteran's appeal, finding that he is not competent to manage the disbursement of his VA benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2025
The Board remands the claim for a review of the validity of the debt, to include whether it was the result of sole administrative error.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2025
The Board remands the claim for payment or reimbursement of VA beneficiary travel expenses due to an incomplete record.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2025
The Board remands the claim for entitlement to service connection for alcohol use disorder as secondary to a service-connected disability due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2025
The appeal for eligibility to enroll into the PCAFC was denied due to the death of the Veteran, preventing final approval and designation.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2025
The Board granted a 10 percent rating for hallux valgus in both the right and left feet, effective January 18, 2020.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2025
The Board granted an initial 70 percent rating for the Veteran's adjustment disorder unspecified, finding that the frequency and severity of the Veteran's psychiatric symptoms more closely approximate the criteria for a 70 percent rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2025
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) as his service-connected disabilities did not prevent him from securing and following a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2025
The appeal for an extension of the Veteran's Chapter 33 delimiting date was denied as new and relevant evidence has not been received to support the claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2025
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities prevent him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation, and the Board grants entitlement to TDIU.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2025
The Board denied the appellant's claim for survivors' pension benefits due to her countable annual income exceeding the applicable maximum annual pension rate.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2025
The appeal for entitlement to a total disability rating due to individual unemployability (TDIU) was dismissed because it was improperly docketed as an AMA appeal when the case was still pending in the legacy system.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2025
The Board dismissed the appeal as there is no case or controversy before them, since the Veteran's compensation benefits were reinstated.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2025
The Board denied recognition of J. as the Veteran's surviving spouse for the purpose of entitlement to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) benefits because they were married less than one year before his death, and there was no evidence that a common-law marriage existed prior to their ceremonial marriage.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2025
The Board denied the Veteran's appeal for a higher initial rating for congestive heart failure with bradycardia and heart block, as his symptoms did not meet the criteria for a rating in excess of 30 percent.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.