Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
23,506 vetted Board decisions in 2025.
The Board granted service connection for chronic pelvic pain based on the evidence showing that the Veteran's condition began during active service.
The appeal for service connection for ingrown toenail on the right great toe is dismissed as it was granted in an April 2025 rating decision.
The appeal contesting the eligibility for attorney fees based on past due benefits was dismissed as the notice of disagreement (NOD) was not timely filed.
The appeal for special monthly compensation based on aid and attendance was withdrawn by the Veteran.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for retroactive payment of DEA benefits under 38 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
The Board is remanding the claim for a TDIU based on a single service-connected disability, specifically ischemic heart disease (IHD), to obtain additional evidence from the Social Security Administration.
The Board remands the claim for an adequate medical opinion to determine the Veteran's eligibility for PCAFC benefits.
The Board remands the service connection claim for chronic cough due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error, as the VA medical opinions were based on an inaccurate premise.
The appeal for eligibility to enroll in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA's) Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) was denied due to the Veteran's death before all necessary steps were completed.
The Board remands the Veteran's claim for eligibility in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) due to an inadequate CEAT review.
The Board remands the Veteran's claim for eligibility to VA educational assistance under Chapter 33, Title 38, United States Code (Post-9/11 GI Bill) due to insufficient information regarding his service in the Air National Guard.
The Board reopened the claim for service connection for a neck condition based on new and relevant evidence, but remanded it for further development.
The Board denied the Veteran's request for an earlier effective date than July 1, 2023, for additional dependency compensation for her minor child, G. R. K., as she did not provide all necessary information to establish their relationship and meet eligibility criteria within one year of a relevant rating decision.
The Board made a favorable finding that the Veteran has a need for personal care services based on a need for supervision or protection, but remanded the case to determine if participation in PCAFC is in his best interest.
The Board remands the claims for further development and adjudication, including whether the Veteran is eligible to enroll in PCAFC and if a 2023 annual clothing allowance should be granted.
The Board remands the matter for a new medical determination considering all medical information of record to correct a pre-decisional duty to assist error.
The Board remands the claims for service connection of left elbow and body pain disabilities, as the VA examinations provided are inadequate to properly adjudicate the claims.
The appeal for service connection for congestive heart failure was dismissed as the benefit sought on appeal has been granted.
The Veteran withdrew his appeal for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) due to service-connected disabilities, and the Board dismissed the appeal.
The appeal of the issue of eligibility for the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) is dismissed due to an extension of eligibility for Legacy participants.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.