Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
23,506 vetted Board decisions in 2025.
The Board remands the claim for an eye disability as secondary to service-connected epilepsy due to inadequate medical opinions.
The appeal with respect to entitlement to service connection for diverticulitis is dismissed due to the lack of a final decision subject to appeal.
The Board remands the claim for further development and adjudication under section 38 U.S.C. § 1725 criteria.
The Board remands the claim for PCAFC benefits to ensure proper notice is provided as required by law.
The Board remands the claims for payment or reimbursement of non-VA medical expenses to reconsider them under 38 U.S.C. §§ 1725, 1728, and associated regulations.
The appeal for service connection for a temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorder was dismissed due to a claims processing error.
The Board remands the matter to satisfy pre-decisional errors pertaining to insufficient notice under 38 C.F.R. § 5104(b) and to conduct additional development of the claim.
The appeal seeking payment or reimbursement of non-VA medical services was dismissed by the Veteran's withdrawal.
The appeal for eligibility to enroll in benefits under the VA's PCAFC was denied because the Veteran did not meet the criteria of a serious injury incurred or aggravated in the line of duty within eligible dates.
The Board remands the claim to obtain additional explanation regarding whether the Veteran requires personal care services and if participation in PCAFC would be in his best interest.
The appeal was dismissed due to the Veteran's death during the pendency of the appeal.
The Board denied the appeal seeking restoration of a 10 percent rating for AC joint arthritis, left shoulder, finding that the reduction from 10 percent to 0 percent was proper based on clear and unmistakable error in the original decision.
The veteran withdrew the appeals for effective dates prior to September 29, 2022 for service connection of radiculopathy of the right lower extremity, surgical scar of the low back, and low back disability.
The Veteran's service-connected mitral valve prolapse was denied a rating in excess of 60 percent prior to January 11, 2008 and from July 12, 2008 to December 22, 2024. However, the Board granted a 100 percent rating for this condition from January 11, 2008 to July 11, 2008 and from December 23, 2024 onwards.
The appeal was dismissed due to the Veteran's death during the pendency of the appeal.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for VA home loan guaranty benefits due to not meeting the minimum service duration requirements.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for specially adapted housing and special home adaptation as his service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria.
The appeal for eligibility in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) was denied due to the Veteran's death before all necessary steps were completed.
The appeal was withdrawn by the Veteran, and therefore, it is dismissed.
The appeal of the Veteran's eligibility for the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) was dismissed due to an extension of eligibility for Legacy participants.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.