Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
23,506 vetted Board decisions in 2025.
The Board dismissed the appeal regarding whether the request for a waiver of recovery of an overpayment of VA compensation benefits was timely received, as the Veteran's benefits were restored and the debt effectively nullified.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities prevented him from securing and following substantial gainful employment, warranting a total disability rating based on individual unemployability.
The appeal regarding the proposed finding of incompetency was dismissed due to a lack of jurisdiction.
The appeal regarding entitlement to survivor's benefits was dismissed due to the appellant having filed multiple appeals for the same issue, making the current case moot.
The Board denied the Veteran's request for restoration of a 100 percent rating and special monthly compensation based on being housebound, as the evidence did not support a higher rating or additional compensation.
The Board remands the case to conduct an accounting and audit to clarify whether an attorney fee of $5,366.92 was recouped from the Veteran and paid to the appellant.
The Board denied service connection for a head injury as the evidence did not show that the Veteran has experienced any functional impairment from either a head injury or TBI during the appeal period.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for recognition as the surviving spouse of the Veteran, finding that she did not meet the criteria due to California's non-recognition of common-law marriages and the lack of evidence showing they intended to enter into a legal marriage.
The Board denied the Veteran's appeal for basic eligibility for educational assistance benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill due to his service consisting entirely of ADT service, which is excluded from active-duty service for this purpose.
The Board remands the issue of eligibility for benefits under the PCAFC to correct a pre-decisional duty to assist error, including an inadequate medical opinion.
The Board remands the claim for verification of whether the Appellant has a secondary school diploma or an equivalency certificate, as required for education benefits under Chapter 1606.
The Board denied the Veteran's appeal for an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for bilateral upper extremity essential tremors, as no claim was received prior to March 16, 2023.
The Veteran's claim for an annual clothing allowance for the 2021 calendar year, for left and right knee braces, was granted due to his continued use of bilateral knee braces for service-connected bilateral knee degenerative joint disease.
The Board remands the matter for an adequate medical opinion to correct a predecisional duty to assist error.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) as his service-connected disabilities did not prevent him from obtaining and maintaining substantially gainful employment.
The Board remands the claim for service connection for urinary frequency, as secondary to diabetes, due to an inadequate medical opinion and a need for a TERA examination.
The Board remands the appeal to allow for a referral of the Veteran's entitlement to TDIU on an extraschedular basis.
The Veteran is granted payment for travel expenses incurred to pick up a prescription from the VA pharmacy in Reno, Nevada.
The Board denied the claim for payment of Chapter 35 DEA benefits prior to July 26, 2022 due to the Appellant not meeting the requirements for retroactive benefits.
The appeal was dismissed due to the Veteran's death during the pendency of this appeal.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.