Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
23,506 vetted Board decisions in 2025.
The appeal for entitlement to total disability based on individual unemployability (TDIU), to include extraschedular consideration, is dismissed due to the Veteran's death.
The Veteran's appeals for an increased rating for PTSD and TDIU were withdrawn, and the Board dismissed these claims.
The Board remands the matter for a new VA opinion by an oncologist to address whether the Veteran's squamous cell carcinoma is at least as likely as not proximately due to service-connected diabetes or aggravated beyond its natural progression by service-connected diabetes disability.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for recognition as the Veteran's surviving spouse for the purpose of Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) benefits due to the marriage occurring more than 15 years after the Veteran's discharge from active duty service.
The appeal for accrued benefits was dismissed as there were no specific errors of fact or law alleged, and the evidence did not support any outstanding benefits.
The Board remands the issue of eligibility to enroll in the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) due to a lack of adequate notice and an inadequate medical opinion.
The Board remands the case to ensure proper notification and a legally adequate medical decision regarding eligibility for PCAFC benefits.
The Board remands the claim for eligibility to enroll for benefits under the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers due to changes in eligibility criteria.
The Board granted service connection for endometriosis, leiomyoma of uterus, and iron deficiency anemia as secondary to the former conditions.
The claim for an earlier effective date than October 21, 2019, for a TDIU is dismissed as it is inextricably intertwined with further development of other issues.
The Board granted service connection for squamous cell carcinoma based on the Veteran's toxic exposures in service.
The Board denied service connection for a neck condition and tremor as the evidence did not support a finding that these conditions began during active service or are otherwise related to an in-service injury, event, or disease.
The Board remands the claim for service connection for bilateral sacroiliitis as secondary to a service-connected lumbar spine condition due to an inadequate medical opinion.
The Board granted service connection for gastritis, finding new and relevant evidence that the Veteran's current diagnosis of gastritis had its onset in service.
The Board remands the case to adjudicate the May 2023 PCAFC application and obtain a medical opinion from the Centralized Eligibility and Appeals Team (CEAT) regarding the Veteran's eligibility for personal care services.
The Board's decision is being remanded to ensure that due process is followed and that there is a complete record upon which to decide the appellant's claim so that he is afforded every possible consideration.
The Board remands the issue of entitlement to service connection for a heart condition, to include left anterior fascicular block (LAFB), due to an incomplete medical opinion that did not address secondary aggravation.
The Board remands the appeal to obtain a more detailed and thoroughly explained medical opinion regarding the Veteran's eligibility for the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC).
The appeal is remanded to the AOJ for a more detailed and thoroughly explained medical opinion regarding the Veteran's eligibility for PCAFC.
The Veteran's application for eligibility to enroll in the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) was denied because his period of active service does not meet the eligibility criteria.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.