Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
23,506 vetted Board decisions in 2025.
The appeal concerning the entitlement to an apportionment of the Veteran's VA disability compensation was withdrawn by the appellant.
The Board denied an earlier effective date for the award of service connection for neurogenic bowel and remanded the issue of entitlement to a higher initial rating.
The appeal was granted to the extent that the request for waiver of recovery of an overpayment of VA death pension benefits was timely filed.
The Board granted service connection for bilateral metatarsalgia, resolving reasonable doubt in the Veteran's favor.
The Board remands the Veteran's claim for a clothing allowance for the calendar year 2019 due to missing records.
The appeal was granted as the September 2021 administrative decision's creation of an overpayment of attorney fees to the appellant was improper.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for cause of death and entitlement to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) due to congestive heart failure, as there was no evidence that it began during or was otherwise related to his active service.
The Board denied direct service connection for obesity and remanded the claim for secondary service connection as it may result in functional impairment of earning capacity.
The appellant is granted basic eligibility for VA home loan guaranty benefits due to his service during the Persian Gulf War Era.
The Board denied benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1815 for a child born with birth defects and remanded the claim for benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1805 for a child born with spina bifida.
The Board remands the claim for VA educational assistance benefits under Chapter 1606 due to a pre-decisional duty-to-assist error regarding the appellant's eligibility.
The appeal is remanded to the AOJ for a more detailed medical opinion and proper notice of the decision on eligibility for PCAFC.
The Board remands the Veteran's claim for eligibility to enroll in the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) as the serious injury incurred by the Veteran now meets the criteria for PCAFC eligibility.
The appeal for benefits under the PCAFC was dismissed due to the extension of eligibility for Legacy participants.
The appeal concerning entitlement to eligibility for PCAFC is remanded due to errors in the decision-making process.
The Board remands the issue of entitlement to eligibility for the Department of Veterans Affairs' Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) due to an inadequate medical opinion.
The appeal regarding the proposed reduction in PTSD rating was dismissed as it is not an adverse decision and cannot be appealed to the Board of Veterans' Appeals.
The Board remands the issue of eligibility to enroll in the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error and an inadequate medical opinion.
The appeal seeking eligibility for benefits under the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) is remanded due to an incomplete record, inadequate notification, and a pre-decisional duty to assist error.
The appeal of eligibility for PCAFC benefits was dismissed due to the extension of eligibility for legacy participants.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.