Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
7,742 vetted Board decisions in 2026.
The Board has remanded the claims for a respiratory disorder and fatigue due to duty-to-assist errors in prior decisions. The Veteran is presumed to have served in the Gulf War, qualifying him for presumptive service connection for undiagnosed illnesses or MUCMIs.
The Board denied a request for an earlier effective date for adding the Veteran's daughter, O.R., as a dependent to his VA award. The earliest effective date was December 3, 2024.
The Veteran seeks payment or reimbursement for ambulance services provided on September 1, 2022. The AOJ denied the claim under incorrect laws and regulations due to a lack of clarity in decision notices and missing records. The appeal is remanded to correct these errors.
The Veteran's appeal is about his eligibility for outpatient dental treatment in March 2021. The VA denied his claim, but the decision was not clear on why he was not eligible. The Board has ordered a remand to provide adequate notice and consider any relevant records.
The Veteran withdrew all his pending claims, and the appeal is dismissed as a result.
The Veteran's application to enroll in the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) was denied due to his death, and therefore, no designation as a Primary Family Caregiver could be completed.
The Veteran's varicose veins of the right leg were related to his military service, and the Board granted service connection for this condition.
The Board dismissed the appeals because the initial denials for payment or reimbursement of non-VA medical services provided during October 23, 2019, through October 25, 2019, were overturned and the appeal is now moot due to the administrative action.
The claim for payment of non-VA emergency medical care provided to the Veteran at William Beaumont Hospital from October 8, 2020, to October 11, 2020, was denied due to untimely filing.
The Veteran's claim for a higher disability evaluation for his jaw disorder is being remanded due to the need for a new examination to assess the current severity of his service-connected condition.
The Board has determined that the January 2023 decision denying eligibility for PCAFC was legally inadequate due to a duty-to-assist error and requires further review by the Centralized Eligibility and Appeals Team (CEAT).
The appeal for eligibility to enroll into the VA's Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) was denied due to the Veteran's death before final approval and enrollment.
The Veteran's HIV infection is denied as there is no nexus between his service and the condition, despite his belief that it was caused by military sexual trauma. The Board found that the evidence does not support a finding of service connection.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for left and right hip strains due to a lack of clarity in the VA examiner's opinion regarding whether his service-connected disabilities caused obesity, which could have contributed to his hip strain. The Board also requested clarification on whether PTSD and OSA aggravated the hip strains.
The Veteran's appeal for continuation of benefits under VA's Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) is dismissed due to the extension of eligibility for legacy participants.
The Veteran withdrew her appeal regarding the issue of competency, as it was resolved in a previous rating decision.
The Board has granted service connection for hypopituitarism with hypogonadism and growth hormone deficiency, secondary to service-connected traumatic brain injury (TBI), and voiding dysfunction with nocturia, secondary to service-connected posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
The Veteran's skin disability, including chronic urticaria, is granted as of July 28, 2020. The Board finds the evidence at least evenly balanced in favor of the Veteran and grants service connection for her skin disability.
The Veteran's aneurysm and related neurological manifestations are being remanded for further examination to determine if they are caused or aggravated by his service-connected kidney disability. The back, right knee, and right knee subluxation disabilities are also being remanded due to inadequate prior VA examinations.
The Board has remanded the case due to errors in obtaining service records and a need for a VA examination to determine if any current foot disorders are related to service.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.