Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
7,742 vetted Board decisions in 2026.
The Veteran's eligibility to enroll in the PCAFC was denied due to a lack of need for personal care services. The Board has decided to remand the case for further development and evaluation based on the precedent decision of Veteran Warriors, Inc.
The request for a waiver of recovery of the overpayment of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) pension benefits, in the amount of $15,996.00 was deemed timely received by the Board and granted to this extent only. However, the issue of whether the waiver should be granted on the merits is remanded for further development.
The Board has remanded the case for a more detailed and thoroughly explained medical opinion regarding the Veteran's need for personal care services, supervision or protection, and instruction or supervision.
The Board has determined that there was a pre-decisional error regarding the adequacy of a medical opinion and remands the case for further development to determine if the Veteran qualifies for personal care services under the PCAFC program.
The Veteran did not have a pending claim at the time of his death and no unpaid benefits were owed. Therefore, accrued benefits cannot be paid to the appellant.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's discharge from VA's PCAFC was improper due to a lack of proper notification and remanded for further action.
The Veteran's appeal regarding the effective date of a grant was dismissed because the Veteran did not provide sufficient information about what specific issues they were appealing.
The Veteran's appeal for an increased disability rating for compression fractures, scoliosis, and spondylosis was dismissed due to the Veteran's death.
The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorders, including Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), unspecified trauma disorder, and schizoaffective disorder, are determined to be the result of his active-duty service. The Board has granted service connection for these conditions.
The Board dismissed the appeal because the February 2020 rating decision was only a proposal to reduce disability ratings, and no final decision had been made. The Veteran acknowledged that his May 2020 VA Form 10182 was invalid as it did not reflect the actual reduction in ratings.
The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for left leg saphenous vein surgery is granted, and the case is remanded to obtain consent forms and schedule an examination.
The Veteran's application for enrollment in the VA's PCAFC was denied due to a lack of medical eligibility criteria, and the Board finds that proper notice was not provided. The decision is remanded to correct these issues.
The appeal for service connection of multiple myeloma is dismissed due to the Veteran's death during the pendency of the appeal.
The Board has determined that there is a pre-decisional duty to assist error and requires an adequate medical decision regarding the Veteran's eligibility for higher level PCAFC benefits. The AOJ must obtain a legally adequate medical opinion from the CEAT.
The Veteran's claims for special home adaptation and specially adapted housing were denied as these benefits are not payable as accrued benefits due to the Veteran's death.
The Veteran's inability to self-sustain in the community due to mobility limitations, weakness, and impaired balance requires personal care services for bathing, dressing, undressing, toileting, and mobility. The Board has granted Level 2 PCAFC benefits.
The Board has decided that the Veteran does not meet the eligibility criteria for participation in the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) based on his current functional status and needs. The decision is being remanded to provide a more detailed medical opinion regarding whether he requires personal care services or supervision, as well as to correct any pre-decisional errors.
The Board found that the overpayment of VA compensation benefits in the amount of $13,746.89 was properly created and is a valid debt due to the Veteran's failure to promptly inform VA of changes in his dependents' status.
The Board has decided that the Veteran does not meet the eligibility requirements for benefits under VA's Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC). The decision is being remanded due to a legal error and insufficient medical opinion.
The Board has granted an increased rating of 40 percent for thoracic strain throughout the review period, which represents a full grant of benefits sought on appeal.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.