Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
7,742 vetted Board decisions in 2026.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's eligibility for PCAFC benefits should be reconsidered due to a lack of sufficient evidence and proper notification. The decision is remanded to allow for further review by VA.
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral hallux limitus and right foot metatarsalgia, as these conditions were combined with the already service-connected bilateral pes planus disability. Service connection is also granted for anemia and denied for hyperlipidemia.
The Board denied service connection for residuals of Lyme disease as the evidence did not support a finding that the Veteran's current condition was incurred in or caused by his military service.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's left hand disability was aggravated by service, and therefore grants service connection for this condition.
The Veteran's left and right lower extremity pitting edema are granted as service-connected.,The Veteran's left and right knee, ankle, GERD, and lumbar spine disabilities are remanded for further review.
The Veteran withdrew his appeal through his representative's submission, effectively dismissing the case.
The Veteran's child, T., was reinstated to her award of VA disability compensation benefits effective December 31, 2023, as the removal on August 1, 2023, was found to be improper.
The Veteran's claim for eligibility to enroll in the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) is being remanded due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error. The AOJ needs to provide a more detailed and thoroughly explained medical opinion from CEAT regarding the Veteran's need for personal care services, supervision or protection, and regular extensive instruction or supervision. Additionally, proper notice must be provided as required by 38 U.S.C. § 5104.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to errors in the initial decision and a lack of supporting documents. The VA will need to provide the Financial Status Report and review the underlying request for waiver.
The Veteran's surviving spouse was granted DIC benefits effective February 1, 2024, for her biological daughter J., who is under the age of 18 at the time of the decision.
The Veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) was dismissed due to the Veteran's failure to submit a VA Form 21-8940, which is required to secure information necessary to properly adjudicate the TDIU claim. More than one year has passed since the initial request.
The Veteran's service-connected epididymitis required intermittent intensive management during the period prior to April 21, 2023. The evidence does not support a finding of recurrent symptomatic infection or requiring greater than two hospitalizations per year.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a right inguinal hernia, finding that there is no evidence of an in-service injury or disease related to the condition and that the current diagnosis was not incurred during active duty.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a vision disability, including cataracts and presbyopia, was denied. Increased ratings were also denied for low back strain, radiculopathy of the sciatic nerve (left and right lower extremities), and residuals of traumatic brain injury.
The Board found that the Veteran's bilateral hand disabilities were not caused by VA care, and denied his claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151.
The Board has remanded the claims for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and total disability rating due to unemployability (TDIU), as well as the issue of a higher rating for SLE, due to inadequate duty to assist and lack of adequate statement of reasons and bases.
The Board denied service connection for a soft tissue lipoma of the right lateral chest, finding that there is no evidence to support a causal relationship between the condition and service.
The Board has remanded the case due to inconsistencies in a previous VA examiner's opinion regarding whether the Veteran's bilateral macular degeneration pre-existed service and was aggravated by military service. The case is now pending further clarification from an appropriate medical professional.
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for service connection for groin pain as proximately due to his service-connected left hip replacement and right hip replacement, finding that the evidence is in at least approximate balance regarding this issue.
The Veteran's service-connected multiple retinal tears in both eyes due to retinal breaks with lattice degeneration were found not to meet the schedular criteria for a compensable rating.,The Veteran did not meet the schedular criteria for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) prior to February 19, 2015.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.