Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
7,742 vetted Board decisions in 2026.
The Board has determined that the eligibility decision for PCAFC benefits was not legally adequate and requires further review by the CEAT. The claim is being remanded to ensure a properly supported medical opinion and compliance with legal requirements.
The Veteran's eligibility for the PCAFC program has been extended until September 30, 2028. The appeal is dismissed as there is no remaining case or controversy.
The Veteran requested a temporary 100 percent evaluation due to surgery on January 7, 2020. The RO failed to obtain the necessary medical records and remanded for further action.
The Board has dismissed the appeal of eligibility for a higher-level stipend under PCAFC based on the March 13, 2023 VA Form 10182 as it is considered a duplicate request and there are no issues to address.
The Board has determined that the VA medical care provided to the Veteran did not result in an additional left eye disability, but further clarification is needed regarding whether it was caused by negligence or a foreseeable event.
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating of unspecified trauma or stressor related, paranoid personality, and intermittent explosive disorders is being remanded due to a duty to assist error. The AOJ needs to schedule the Veteran for an examination by an appropriate clinician to determine the current severity of these conditions.
The Board has determined that the Agency of Original Jurisdiction (AOJ) did not satisfy a regulatory or statutory duty and remanded for further development to determine who the appropriate custodian was and to establish a fiduciary on behalf of the then-minor child.
The Veteran's esophageal cancer is granted as service connected due to herbicide agent exposure during his service at Nakhon Phanom Royal Thai Air Force Base.
The Board dismissed the appeal because the appellant requested to withdraw their appeal before a decision was made.
The Board has determined that the eligibility decision for PCAFC benefits is legally inadequate and requires a new medical opinion to address the Veteran's functional limitations.
The Board has decided that the VA educational assistance benefits under Chapter 33, Title 38 of the United States Code (known as the Post-9/11 GI Bill) were terminated due to the Veteran's failure to complete his military service agreement. The decision is remanded for further action including obtaining relevant records and providing proper notice.
The Veteran's claim for benefits under the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) is remanded due to insufficient evidence regarding his need for personal care services.
The Veteran's service-connected unspecified trauma-and stressor-related disorder is unclear in determining if he needs regular aid and attendance or is permanently housebound due to his disability. The case is remanded for a VA examination.
The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to VA medical treatment is being remanded because the claims file does not contain all of his VA treatment records, including those from October 2017 to January 2018 when he was hospitalized at a Louisville VAMC.
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of medical expenses related to non-VA laboratory tests conducted on January 7, 2025, as these services were pre-approved by VA and aligned with treatment for his bladder cancer.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for eligibility to enroll in the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) due to a lack of evidence showing that he requires personal care services for at least six continuous months.
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for service connection for an umbilical hernia, finding that it was aggravated by his active service.
The appeal is dismissed as the Board does not have jurisdiction to review decisions made by a third-party administrator (Optum) regarding payment for services under the Veterans Community Care Program.
The Board has granted service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including adjustment disorder with depressed mood, finding that the Veteran's current mental health symptoms are attributable to his service.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's pre-existing bilateral foot condition was aggravated by service, and therefore grants entitlement to service connection for this condition.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.