Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
7,742 vetted Board decisions in 2026.
The Board has remanded the claim for eligibility for enrollment in the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) due to a duty-to-assist error. The CEAT needs to provide a legally adequate medical decision regarding the Veteran's eligibility and need for personal care services.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate medical opinions regarding whether the preexisting inguinal hernia was aggravated by service. The Veteran's left inguinal hernia is being reviewed for potential service connection and aggravation.
The Board has granted the apportionment of Veteran's VA disability benefits to the appellee and her child, A.M., with effective dates from September 1, 2020. The termination of the apportionment for the appellee was also granted on December 1, 2022.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for restless leg syndrome, finding that there was no evidence of an in-service incident or a relationship to service-connected conditions.
The Board vacated its July 10, 2025 decision due to an insufficient degree of clarity in the initial decision. The claim for a waiver of the recoupment of an overpayment is granted as it meets the criteria for equity and good conscience.
The Board has determined that the initial decision denying eligibility for enrollment in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) is legally inadequate and requires a remand to obtain a new medical review by the Centralized Eligibility and Appeals Team (CEAT).
The Veteran's spouse was denied DIC benefits because the marriage did not meet the required duration and timing criteria, as it occurred more than a year after his separation from active duty service.
The Board has found that the initial decision denying eligibility for PCAFC was legally inadequate and remanded to allow a new medical determination considering all medical information of record.
The Board dismissed the appeal as an improper concurrent election, and service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death will not be reviewed under this appeal stream.
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not require personal care services for a minimum of six continuous months based on an inability to perform activities of daily living or a need for supervision, protection, or instruction. The decision is being remanded due to inadequate medical opinions and incomplete notice.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to an inadequate medical opinion, and it is up to the AOJ to obtain a proper one.
The Veteran's eligibility for continued enrollment in the PCAFC program was extended until September 30, 2028 due to a final rule extending the transition period.
The Board has granted the appellant's claims for service connection for a stomach tumor, involuntary facial movements, and neurological disability due to exposure to Camp Lejeune contaminated water. The appeal is remanded for further examination regarding an eye disability.
The Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation at the R-2 level was granted in a previous decision. As the Veteran is already receiving the highest possible rate of SMC, the appeal is dismissed.
Your appeal has been dismissed because you withdrew your request for SMC based on loss of use of a creative organ.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for esophageal disability and dysphagia, finding that there was no evidence to support a link between these conditions and his military service.
The Board has determined that the overpayment of $3,330.00 is valid and denied the Veteran's challenge to its validity.
The Board has determined that there is a pre-decisional duty to assist error and requires a new medical determination considering all medical information of record.
The Veteran's spouse was denied eligibility to enroll in the VA Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) due to the death of the Veteran, making it impossible to complete the application requirements and designate a Primary Family Caregiver.
The veteran's service during the Persian Gulf War meets the minimum requirements for VA home loan guaranty benefits, and his appeal is granted.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.