Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
The veteran's spouse seeks pension and special monthly pension payments due to medical expenses incurred by the veteran in 2002. The Board denied this claim as there was no evidence in the file at the date of death that permitted a reasonable estimation of the unreimbursed medical expenses for the year of death.
The veteran's claim for compensation benefits under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 is being remanded due to procedural issues and further development is required.
The Board denied an increased rating for postoperative residuals of colon cancer, finding that the veteran's condition more nearly approximated occasional leakage rather than involuntary bowel movements.
The Board has reopened the claim of service connection for a left eye injury, but denied it as new and material evidence was not presented to substantiate the claim.
The veteran's entitlement to additional educational assistance benefits under Chapter 30, Title 38, United States Code was not warranted as his benefits were properly terminated at the end of his July 2003 term.
The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to a request for a videoconference hearing. The claim will be returned to the Board after the scheduled hearing.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for waiver of recovery of an overpayment of nonservice-connected pension benefits, finding that recovery would not be against equity and good conscience due to fault on the part of the veteran in creating the overpayment.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma due to exposure to ionizing radiation, finding insufficient evidence of such exposure and thus no link between his condition and military service.
The Board denied the appellant's request to reopen her claim of entitlement to service connection for the cause of the veteran's death, finding no new and material evidence had been submitted.
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected foot drop does not meet the criteria for special monthly compensation based on loss of use of a foot.
The Board denied service connection for atrophy of the right cerebral hemisphere with mild left hemiparesis, concluding that the veteran's condition was due to natural progression and not aggravated by his military service.
The Board denied an increased rating for the veteran's service-connected peptic ulcer disease with gastritis, currently rated at 20 percent.
The Board has determined that the veteran's urethritis is primarily manifested by urinary frequency and voiding dysfunction requiring absorbent materials, warranting a 40 percent evaluation.
The Board denied an increased rating for right posterior chest shell fragment wound residuals and right thoracic nerve neuralgia, both currently evaluated at 10 percent.
The veteran's respiratory disability is not considered to be caused or aggravated by VA treatment from March 16, 1992 to April 16, 1992.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an increased rating for residuals of pelvic fractures, finding no current residual disabilities related to his service-connected injuries.
The Board has determined that the veteran's right great toe disability warrants a 20 percent rating, effective September 11, 1992.
The Board found that gout was not present during service or within one year of separation, and is not related to any incident during service. Therefore, the claim for service connection for gout was denied.
The Board has remanded the case for further development to determine if the veteran was exposed to ionizing radiation or DDT during active duty and whether such exposure is linked to his multiple myeloma.
The Board has determined that the veteran's bilateral choroideremia warrants a rating of 30 percent, reflecting concentric contraction of his visual fields to between 35 and 33.5 degrees in both eyes.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.