Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current disability of the right or left hand that is related to an injury during service. As such, the claim for service connection for residuals of a right or left hand injury is denied.
The veteran's military service does not meet the threshold requirements for nonservice-connected disability pension benefits as he did not serve during a period of war. The claim is denied.
The Board found that the veteran's VA disability compensation is subject to recoupment of the amount of readjustment pay received at separation from service, and denied the appeal.
The veteran's claim for educational assistance under Chapter 30 is being remanded due to the absence of certain records and the need to explain terms like 'Erroneous Entry'.
The Board found that the appellant's character of discharge was dishonorable due to a felony conviction, and thus he is not eligible for VA benefits.
The veteran's NSC pension benefits were terminated effective September 1, 1998. The case is being remanded due to the failure of the appellant to appear at a scheduled video-conference hearing.
The Board denied the appellant's request for an extension of his delimiting date for educational benefits under Chapter 30, Title 38, United States Code beyond August 16, 2002.
The Board dismissed the appeal due to the appellant requesting withdrawal of their appeal prior to a decision being made.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for peptic ulcer, malnutrition, residuals of a shell fragment wound of the right back, malaria, dysentery, influenza, and paralysis. The evidence received since the previous denials was not new and material to reopen any of these claims.
The Board has determined that the veteran's joint pain and fatigue are due to an undiagnosed illness related to his service in the Persian Gulf War, warranting service connection.
The veteran's claim for an evaluation in excess of 50 percent for residuals of traumatic encephalopathy is being remanded due to the need for additional medical records and examinations.
The Board has determined that the appellant's deceased spouse did not have qualifying service with the Regular Philippine Scouts, and therefore does not meet the requirements for basic eligibility for VA non-service-connected death pension benefits.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for VA benefits due to a lack of qualifying service in the United States Armed Forces, as determined by the National Personnel Records Center.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for an effective date prior to March 13, 2002 for payment of Dependents Educational Assistance (DEA) benefits. The decision was based on the fact that the appellant did not file a claim within one year of the December 29, 2000 rating decision.
The Board denied the appellant's claim as her spouse did not have verified active military service with the U.S. Armed Forces, and therefore was not eligible for VA benefits.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient notice and assistance provided by the RO, as well as an inadequate review of the claim file by a VA examiner. The appellant's claim for service connection for the cause of her husband's death is being reviewed again with additional development.
The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development, including obtaining tissue slides from a previous biopsy of glioblastoma. The appellant's claim is based on potential exposure to herbicides in Vietnam and seeks service connection for the cause of her husband's death.
The veteran's claims for increased ratings on his service-connected disabilities have been denied. The Board found that the evidence did not meet the criteria for higher evaluations under the applicable rating schedule.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a skin disorder, finding no evidence of such condition during or within one year after his active service. The VA Agent Orange protocol also found no evidence linking the veteran's current skin condition to exposure to herbicides. As a result, the claim was not granted.
The Board finds that the veteran's external carotid system aneurysm affecting the left ear, face, and neck is service-connected as it likely began during his military service due to injury.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.