Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 vetted Board decisions for Other conditions.
The VA Regional Office (RO) denied the appellant's request for an increased evaluation of her right hip disability, which was previously rated at 30 percent disabling and later increased to 50 percent effective from May 1, 2001. The RO is now remanding the case for further development.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to a lack of proper notification and treatment records, as well as VCAA compliance issues.
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to incomplete medical records and a need for an examination.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for educational assistance benefits under Chapter 35, Title 38, United States Code due to lack of eligibility based on age requirements.
The Board has determined that the veteran's left shoulder disability, resulting in limitation of motion to the shoulder level, warrants a rating of 20 percent.
The Board found that the appellant's deceased husband did not have qualifying service as a veteran, and thus denied her claim for VA death benefits.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records and a supplemental opinion from an oncologist.
The veteran's claim for a higher rating for his service-connected postoperative avulsion fracture of the left tibial spine was denied. The RO assigned a 20 percent disability rating effective March 27, 2002, and a separate 10 percent rating for post-traumatic arthritis of the left knee. The veteran's claim for service connection for a skin disorder secondary to Agent Orange exposure is pending.
The veteran is seeking service connection for a cardiovascular disorder manifested by sinus arrhythmia. The Board has determined that further examination and review of the case are necessary to determine if the condition is related to his military service.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and arranging for a genitourinary examination to determine if service connection is warranted for chronic prostatitis and whether an initial compensable rating should be assigned for bilateral varicoceles.
The veteran's claims for service connection for right foot numbness and hand tremors are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical opinions on the etiology of these conditions.
The Board denied an increased rating for the veteran's service-connected left knee disability, finding that the evidence did not support a higher evaluation based on limitation of motion or instability.
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete development of medical records and need for a VA examination. The veteran's claim for service connection for a nervous disorder, currently characterized as dementia, secondary to Agent Orange exposure is on appeal.
The Board denied the appellant's claim as she could not be recognized as the veteran's surviving spouse for VA death benefits purposes due to her divorce from the veteran and subsequent remarriage.
The Board has determined that the current evidence is insufficient to properly rate the veteran's service-connected conditions and has therefore remanded the case for further development.
The Board determined that the appellant is not eligible for VA benefits due to a lack of verified active military service with the U.S. Armed Forces.
The Board found that the veteran's left lower extremity disability, manifested by intermittent discomfort and pain with walking, does not warrant an increased rating beyond the current 20 percent.
The veteran's claim for educational assistance at a full-time rate was denied as she pursued only half-time training during the specified period.
The Board denied the veteran's claim as there is no current disability residual to a gunshot wound injury, and thus service connection cannot be established.
The Board has granted a 60 percent disability rating for the veteran's service-connected varicose veins of the left lower extremity, finding that the symptoms more nearly approximate the criteria for this higher rating.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.