Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 vetted Board decisions for Other conditions.
The Board has granted a 40 percent evaluation for the veteran's service-connected ventral hernia, finding that his condition more nearly approximates the criteria for such an evaluation due to its large size and inability to support with a belt under ordinary conditions.
The VA has determined that the veteran's dysthymic disorder is currently evaluated at a 30 percent disability rating, reflecting no more than moderate impairment in occupational and social functioning.
The Board has determined that the evidence submitted does not meet the criteria for reopening the claim of service connection for pleurisy, as it is not new and material.
The Board denied the veteran's claim, finding that the RO properly adjusted his delimiting date for Chapter 30 educational assistance benefits and that he did not meet the eligibility criteria due to a reduction in force.
The veteran's appeal is denied as he does not meet the eligibility requirements for educational assistance benefits under Chapter 30, Title 38, United States Code.
The Board denied the veteran's claim of reopening his lung disorder claim due to exposure to Agent Orange, finding that he did not submit new and material evidence.
The Board found no competent medical evidence linking the veteran's genital herpes to his military service, and thus denied the claim for service connection.
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected post-operative chondromalacia of the left knee warrants a 10 percent disability rating, effective from the date of the initial grant of service connection. The temporary total rating for surgical treatment beyond September 30, 1998 is also granted.
The Board found no evidence of service connection for paralysis of the lower extremities due to carbon tetrachloride exposure, as there was no credible evidence of such exposure or a causal link.
The veteran's right fifth toe fracture resulted in moderate disability, and a 10% evaluation was granted.
The Board denied a rating in excess of 30 percent for residuals of a status post aortic valve replacement due to aortic insufficiency, finding that the veteran's condition did not meet the criteria for a higher rating based on his symptoms and examination findings.
The Board has determined that the veteran's current heart and lung disorders, including COPD and aortic valve stenosis, did not originate in or are not related to his service, specifically his pneumonia during service. The Board found no evidence linking these conditions to any incident of service.
The Board found that the veteran is providing for his minor dependents and the appellant has not demonstrated financial hardship on behalf of the veteran's minor children, thus denying the apportionment of the veteran's VA disability compensation benefits.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral uveitis, finding that there was no medical evidence linking her current condition to her period of active service.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for uveitis, finding that it was not incurred in or aggravated by his military service.
The appellant is not entitled to the payment of accrued benefits in an amount greater than $615. The RO has determined that only $615 of the widow's funeral expenses were paid, and thus he cannot receive more.
The Board denied an initial evaluation in excess of 50 percent for the veteran's left shoulder disability, finding that a maximum schedular evaluation of 70 percent had already been assigned.
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for service connection for a left leg disability due to new and material evidence submitted since the July 1997 rating decision.
The Board found that the veteran's service-connected bowel problems (seepage) are not manifested by severe disability, and thus denied an initial rating in excess of 10 percent.
The Board denied the veteran's application to reopen his claim for service connection for a right eye condition, finding that new and material evidence had not been submitted.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.