Other conditions Board decisions

The Board found no causal relationship between the veteran's arteriosclerotic peripheral vascular disease and his service-connected bilateral trench foot, thus denying the claim for secondary service connection.

The Board has determined that there is no legal entitlement to additional compensation for the veteran's ex-spouse due to a service-connected disability rating of 30 percent or more. The veteran's benefits were reduced because he was divorced and his former spouse ceased being considered a dependent.

The Board found that the veteran's schizoaffective disorder was not incurred or aggravated by his active service and denied his claim for service connection.

The veteran's service-connected residuals of a shrapnel wound to Muscle Group XIX are currently rated at 30 percent, and the claim for a separate rating is granted.

The Board has denied the veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected left eye disability, finding that the evidence does not support a higher evaluation.

The Board found that the veteran's death from pulmonary edema and central nervous system suppression was not caused by or related to his military service, and denied the claim for service connection.

The Board has remanded the case due to inconsistencies in the veteran's submissions and potential fraudulent actions. The RO is instructed to verify the authenticity of the statements from prospective employers and confirm if they were based on a medical examination report provided by the veteran.

The appellant is not entitled to recognition as the surviving spouse of the veteran for purposes of VA death benefits due to her divorce from the veteran prior to his death.

The Board denied the appellant's claim for service connection for a gastrointestinal disability, including stomach ulcers, hiatal hernia, reflux esophagitis or esophageal stenosis, finding no evidence of chronic gastrointestinal disease in service and attributing any post-service conditions to non-service causes.

The veteran's request for a waiver of an overpayment of pension benefits was denied because it was not submitted within the required 180-day period following notification.

The appellant's claim for basic eligibility for VA benefits was denied as he did not have qualifying service, and his DD 214 only reflected service from August 28, 1945 to December 31, 1946.

The veteran's claim for an increased rating for his subtotal gastrectomy, postoperative duodenal ulcer was denied as the condition does not meet criteria for a higher rating.

The Board found no evidence of warts during service and denied the veteran's claim for service connection as they were not incurred in or aggravated by active duty.

The Board denied the claimant's eligibility for VA benefits based on service due to lack of verified military service in the U.S. Armed Forces or Commonwealth Army.

The Board of Veterans' Appeals has determined that the veteran's service-connected right medial malleolus fracture residuals do not meet the criteria for a rating greater than 20 percent.

The Board denied the veteran's request for a waiver of recovery of an overpayment of VA nonservice-connected disability pension benefits, finding no fault on the part of the VA and some fault on the part of the veteran. The decision concluded that recovery would not be against equity and good conscience.

The Board found that the loan guaranty indebtedness of $4,999.62 against the veteran was not validly created due to lack of notice of default and foreclosure.

The Board found no additional disability resulting from the veteran's VA surgeries and denied his claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.

The Board denied the veteran's request for waiver of recovery of an overpayment of VA pension benefits, finding that recovery would not be against equity and good conscience due to the veteran's fault in creating the debt.

The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for an eye disorder, finding that his current condition was not related to a disease or injury of service and that it did not increase in severity during active service.