Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 vetted Board decisions for Other conditions.
The Board denied an increased rating for chronic epididymitis with history of hydrocelectomy and did not address the claim for special monthly compensation based on loss of use of a creative organ.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development and readjudication due to new evidence received by the appellant, changes in the law, and incomplete medical records.
The Board denied the veteran's request for waiver of recovery of an overpayment of VA Chapter 31 vocational rehabilitation benefits in the amount of $1,614.37 due to no fault on the part of the veteran and undue financial hardship.
The Board has determined that the veteran's malaria, bunions, and prostatitis were all incurred during his active military service.
The Board found that the veteran's current foot symptoms are not related to his service-connected metatarsalgia of the right foot and denied an increased rating.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for service connection for the cause of her husband's death, finding that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen the original claim. The evidence did not show a direct link between the veteran's active service or his service-connected varicose veins and his fatal condition.
The Board denied service connection for the veteran's claimed eye disability, finding that there is no link between his current condition and active service.
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection for a skin disorder as secondary to mustard gas exposure and has determined that the veteran incurred this condition in service.
The veteran's claim for a permanent and total disability rating for pension purposes was granted, effective from September 15, 1999. His combined disability rating did not meet the regulatory requirements of 38 C.F.R. § 4.16.
The Board denied the veteran's claim to reopen his service connection for chest pain, finding that new and material evidence was not received.
The Board has determined that the veteran's claim for service connection for a stomach disorder cannot be reopened because no new and material evidence was received since the December 1983 rating decision.
The Board of Veterans' Appeals has remanded the case to the Regional Office for further action due to issues related to the termination of dependency and indemnity compensation following the appellant's marriage.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for basic eligibility for VA disability benefits due to a finding by the Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) that the appellant had no service as a member of the United States Armed Forces, including the Philippine Commonwealth Army.
The veteran's claim for an increased rating for residuals of a shrapnel wound to the right arm was granted, with a 10 percent evaluation effective from September 29, 1998. The rating was later reduced to noncompensable (0%) effective January 2, 2001.
The VA denied the appellant's claim for legal entitlement to VA benefits, finding that new and material evidence had not been presented.
The veteran's service-connected deformity of the right fifth finger does not prevent him from engaging in substantially gainful employment.
The Board found that the appellant's abdominal hernia with diastasis recti does not meet the criteria for a higher rating, as it is not large or not well supported by belt under ordinary conditions. The current 20% rating assigned in June 1997 remains unchanged.
The VA determined that the veteran's service-connected valvular heart disease did not cause or contribute to his death from arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular accident, and deep venous thrombosis. The Board found no evidence linking these conditions to service.
The veteran's prostate disorder and left lower leg disability are not service-connected. The Board finds that the veteran did not meet the criteria for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151, as there was no negligence or fault on VA's part in providing medical treatment. The Board also found insufficient evidence to establish a secondary service connection between the left lower leg disability and the service-connected burn scars.
The Board found that the veteran's present genitourinary disorder is not related to his active service and denied his claim for service connection.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.