Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 vetted Board decisions for Other conditions.
The Board has granted service connection for fatigue syndrome and chest pain resulting from an undiagnosed illness, but denied service connection for fainting/blackouts/unexplained loss of consciousness.
The veteran's schizoaffective disorder is currently rated at 30 percent disabling, and the Board finds that this rating adequately reflects his disability.
The VA has determined that the veteran's right hand boxer's fracture does not warrant a rating higher than 10 percent, as there is no evidence of ankylosis or arthritis. The current medical evidence most closely fits within the criteria for the currently assigned 10 percent disability rating.
The Board found that the termination of the veteran's nonservice-connected pension benefits was proper due to his receipt of a settlement from an employment-related litigation action, which was considered countable income for purposes of determining eligibility for pension benefits.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an extension of disability convalescent benefits beyond January 31, 1999 due to surgery he underwent in December 1998. The evidence showed that the veteran had returned to work by January 22, 1999 and did not require further convalescence.
The veteran's appeal for an increased evaluation for conversion reaction as a residual of encephalitis has been dismissed because the appellant withdrew his appeal prior to the Board making a decision.
The appellant's service is not considered active military service for the purpose of VA disability pension benefits, and thus he does not meet the requirements for non-service-connected disability pension.
The Board denied the veteran's request for waiver of recovery of an overpayment of nonservice-connected disability pension benefits, finding that his bad faith in creating the overpayment precluded a waiver.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for additional disability compensation benefits for her dependents, finding that the earliest effective date was November 1, 1999.
The Board denied the appellant's claim as her deceased spouse did not have verified Philippine service for purposes of establishing eligibility for VA benefits.
The Board denied service connection for a right eye condition in April 1974, finding no evidence of an injury during service and that the disorder was not related to military service.
The Board granted a partial waiver of the veteran's loan guaranty indebtedness in the amount of $5,909.89 and interest, finding that further collection would cause undue hardship.
The veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the claim for service connection for Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS).
The Board denied higher evaluations for facial numbness, diminished sense of smell, and diminished sense of taste as they do not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under the applicable diagnostic codes.
The case is being remanded to clarify whether the treatment at West Florida Regional Medical Center was for an emergent condition and to obtain further evidence.
The Board has determined that the February 1946 and May 1948 rating decisions involved clear and unmistakable error in assigning a 10 percent disability evaluation for the service-connected shrapnel wound scars. The May 1995 rating decision, however, did not involve CUE as there was no evidence of record at that time supporting a higher rating.
The Board has remanded the veteran's claims for service connection due to a change in the law regarding veterans' benefits, specifically the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000.
The VA denied an increased disability rating for the veteran's service-connected degenerative joint disease of the left hip, currently rated at 30 percent.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for special monthly compensation (SMC) for loss of use of his left lower extremity, finding that there was no evidence to support a finding of 'loss of use' as defined by VA regulations.
The Board denied the appellant's claim because his service did not establish him as a veteran for VA purposes.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.