Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 vetted Board decisions for Other conditions.
The Board has determined that the appellant's service-connected hydradenitis does not warrant an increased rating beyond the current 50 percent assigned.
The Board denied the appellant's claim of basic eligibility for VA benefits due to a lack of documented service in the United States Armed Forces, specifically as a member of the Philippine Commonwealth Army.
The Board has granted service connection for cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure as secondary to the veteran's service-connected hypertension. The rating for hypertension remains at 10 percent.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for educational assistance benefits under Chapter 30, Title 38, United States Code, due to his not meeting the eligibility criteria established by Congress.
The Board has granted the veteran's request for waiver of recovery of an overpayment of $464 in pension benefits, finding that repayment would cause undue hardship and be against equity and good conscience.
The Board found that the appellant had no valid military service and therefore denied his claim for VA benefits.
The Board denied a compensable evaluation for service-connected malaria, finding no evidence of active malaria or its residuals.
The Board has granted service connection for retinal detachment and denied an initial compensable evaluation for bilateral calcaneal spurs. The veteran's right eye was diagnosed with a detached retina six days after his retirement from active service, linked to a weight lifting injury during the last week of his service.
The veteran's claim for educational assistance benefits under Chapter 30, Title 38, United States Code, for enrollment prior to October 19, 1997, is denied due to the receipt date of the application being one year prior to the RO's receipt of the veteran's application.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for basic eligibility for VA benefits due to a lack of recognized military service, thus denying his claim.
The veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection and a 50% rating for a total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was denied. The effective date of the award is set at August 5, 1998.
The Board has remanded the case for further development and review, including a recertification from ARPERCEN regarding the appellant's deceased spouse's military service. The case will be reconsidered based on all evidence received since the statement of the case.
The veteran's appeal was dismissed due to their death.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations for his service-connected bilateral deafness and chronic otitis media, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating under the applicable criteria.
The veteran is entitled to reimbursement for unauthorized private inpatient hospital care due to a medical emergency and the unavailability of VA facilities.
The veteran's appeal was dismissed as there is no justiciable case or controversy that the Board can resolve, and he did not seek a tangible benefit.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a bulging disc, finding no evidence of such condition in service or post-service. The Board also found that any current bulging disc is not related to his service-connected chronic lumbosacral strain.
The veteran's recurrent ganglion cyst of the right foot has been rated at a 30 percent since June 1, 1992.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for numbness in the right foot and pain in the buttocks, as well as his claim for a compensable rating for coronary artery disease. The evidence did not support the presence of chronic disabilities associated with these conditions that were related to service.
The veteran's appeal was dismissed because he requested the appeal be withdrawn prior to a decision being made.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.