Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 vetted Board decisions for Other conditions.
The veteran's service-connected degenerative joint disease at L5-S1 is currently manifested by severe symptoms, including significant decrease in range of motion and objective findings of pain. The Board found that the criteria for an evaluation in excess of 40 percent have not been met.
The Board denied an increased rating for the veteran's service-connected duodenal ulcer disease, finding that his condition did not meet the criteria for a higher disability rating.
The veteran is seeking a higher evaluation for his esophageal disorder, which was initially granted in June 1997. The RO assigned a 30 percent rating effective from May 20, 1993. However, the Board finds that the March 1998 VA examination report is inadequate and requires further development to determine the precise periods of time during which an increased evaluation may be warranted.
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records and further development is needed to determine if any left foot disorder is related to service.
The Board has determined that the veteran's varicose veins of the left leg do not warrant a rating higher than 10 percent, as there is no evidence of chronic discoloration, persistent edema or eczema, or lower extremity ulcers. The symptoms described are consistent with a 10 percent evaluation.
The Board found that the veteran's service-connected lower back disability, currently rated at 20 percent, does not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation.
The Board granted a 10 percent rating for the veteran's service-connected left knee condition, status post left medial meniscectomy with degenerative changes. The claimant was denied an increased rating for his calcific tendinitis of the left shoulder.
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected fungal condition of the feet warrants a rating of 30 percent, primarily due to constant itching and pain, as well as occasional exfoliation, resulting in marked disfigurement of the feet and toes.
The veteran's claim for a higher disability rating for undetermined-type cephalalgia is granted, with a 50% rating effective from the date of the decision.
The Board denied an increased evaluation for the veteran's arthritis of the right elbow and assigned a separate 10 percent rating for his postoperative scar of the right elbow. The effective date for the latter was not granted.
The Board has denied the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for a left hip disorder, finding that new and material evidence was not submitted since the last final denial in June 1996.
The veteran's low back disorder, characterized by chronic pain with radiation to the left lower extremity and moderate limitation of motion, has been rated at 40 percent since January 31, 1996. The Board found that his symptoms more nearly approximate the criteria for a 60 percent rating due to pronounced intervertebral disc syndrome.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for arthritis of the knees and for evaluations in excess of 20 percent for his right knee disability, as well as a compensable evaluation for his left knee disability. The appeals were based on the veteran's contention that he had arthritis secondary to his service-connected knee disabilities.
The Board denied the appellant's request for waiver of recovery of an overpayment of nonservice-connected pension benefits, finding that his failure to report receipt of Social Security benefits was due to bad faith.
The veteran's appeal for a greater subsistence allowance under Chapter 31, Title 38, United States Code, for his participation in an apprenticeship program from September 21, 1998 to December 31, 1998 is denied.
The veteran's claim for restoration of a 60 percent rating for pancreatitis, including service connection for abdominal adhesions as secondary to pancreatitis, is granted.
The veteran's claim for an increased disability rating for his service-connected low back disability is denied as the evidence does not meet the criteria for a higher rating.
The Board found insufficient evidence to support the claim of service connection for diphtheria, as there is no current diagnosis or link between the claimed condition and service. The appellant's testimony was not considered sufficient medical evidence.
The Board found that the veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a head and neck injury to include memory loss was not well-grounded due to lack of evidence showing a nexus between his current disabilities and an in-service injury.
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a neck injury and subsequent development of Brown-Sequard syndrome, finding that there is no well-grounded evidence to support the claim.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.