Other conditions Board decisions

The veteran's claim of service connection for a left eye disorder as secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus is well-grounded, and the appeal is granted. The veteran should be afforded another VA examination to clarify the likely etiology of his claimed eye disorder.

The veteran's claim for service connection for a right foot disorder is denied. The claim of secondary service connection for the same condition based on his left great toe disability is not well grounded, and thus cannot be granted. His claims for increased evaluations are also not well grounded.

The Board denied an initial disability rating in excess of 10 percent for service-connected patellofemoral pain syndrome (patellar chondromalacia), left, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating due to lack of instability or subluxation.

The veteran's death was not caused by a service-connected condition, and the appellant is not eligible for dependency and indemnity compensation or educational assistance under Chapter 35.

The Board granted a TDIU on February 8, 2000. The attorney is eligible for payment of 20% of past-due benefits awarded to the veteran due to this decision.

The Board has denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a disability manifested by weakness and pain in the arms, finding that there is no evidence to support such a claim.

The Board found that the veteran's periodontal disease with tooth loss was not caused by VA prescription medication and denied his claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.

The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected thoracic spine spondylosis warrants a 10 percent disability rating, as it is currently rated.

The Board denied the veteran's claims of service connection for a penile rash and initial compensable evaluations for pseudofolliculitis barbae and acne keloiditis nuchae due to lack of evidence showing current disability, failure to report for scheduled VA examinations, and lack of continuity of symptoms from service.

The Board found that the veteran does not currently have post-traumatic stress disorder and denied service connection for this condition.

The Board has granted a 10% rating for traumatic encephalopathy, effective December 1, 1993. Attorney fees are now eligible from past-due benefits resulting from this decision.

The Board denied the veteran's claim for a higher evaluation for his service-connected right epididymitis, finding that the correct facts were before them and they applied the relevant laws and regulations correctly.

The veteran's claim for a higher rating for his service-connected depressive reaction was granted, with the effective date being December 23, 1998.

The Board denied an increased evaluation for the veteran's service-connected left ankle fracture, finding that his current symptoms are due to the intercurrent injury and not related to his pre-existing condition.

The Board denied the veteran's claims for an effective date earlier than May 19, 1997 for service connection and a higher rating for his left hand gunshot wound disability. The appeal is dismissed.

The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for the cause of his death and also denied the appellant's request for Survivors' and Dependents' Educational Assistance benefits under Chapter 35, Title 38, United States Code. The denial was based on a lack of evidence linking the cause of death to either service or a service-connected disability.

The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder as new and material evidence was not presented, resulting in a final denial of this issue.

The Board determined that the veteran's arachnoid cyst and essential postural tremor are not service-connected, as there is no evidence of a disease associated with exposure to herbicide agents during service. The claim was found not well-grounded.

The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the claim of service connection for bilateral retinal histoplasmosis chorioretinitis, which was previously denied in December 1991.

The VA determined that the veteran's service-connected traumatic fracture of tooth number 8 with extensive bone loss did not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation, as his teeth and jawbone could be replaced by suitable prosthetics.