Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 vetted Board decisions for Other conditions.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an increased evaluation of her service-connected focal glomerulosclerosis, currently rated at 20 percent. The evidence did not support a higher rating as there was no indication that she required absorbent materials changed more than twice per day or had daytime voiding intervals less than one hour.
The veteran's son, who was 32 years old at the time of his father's death, is not eligible for death pension benefits as he did not meet the age criteria for a surviving child.
The veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for the exclusion of children's income due to hardship is denied as there was no communication prior to January 20, 1998 that could constitute a claim.
The veteran's claims for service connection were denied as the evidence did not show that any of his claimed conditions are related to his period of active duty.
The veteran's claim for an effective date earlier than September 19, 1997, for the grant of service connection for residuals of frozen feet is denied.
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim of service connection for an eye disorder, but finds that it is not well-grounded due to lack of competent evidence linking the current condition to service.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a foot disorder and back and hip disorders, finding that there was no well-grounded evidence to support these claims.
The Board has determined that the veteran's left jaw disorder, including TMJ syndrome, is service-connected.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection and reopening of his claims multiple times, citing lack of new or material evidence.
The Board denied the veteran's claims of service connection for residuals of a back injury and pulmonary disorder, finding that new and material evidence was not submitted to reopen the claim for residuals of a back injury. The claim for pulmonary disorder was also denied as not well-grounded.
The veteran's claim for a waiver of overpayment of improved pension benefits was denied due to his failure to report unearned income, which the Board found constituted bad faith.
The veteran's net worth is deemed sufficient to cover his current living expenses, but not enough for a pension due to the need to consume some of it for maintenance. The Board denied the claim as the veteran's net worth currently bars him from receiving improved pension benefits.
The veteran's appeal is dismissed because he died during the pendency of his case.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for payment of the cost of an in-home spa as a necessary part of outpatient care under the Home Improvement and Structural Alterations (HISA) program, finding that it is not feasible or medically necessary.
The Board has granted a rating of 30 percent for the veteran's left elbow disability from November 30, 1988 through April 22, 1992. The claim for increased ratings beyond this period is denied.
The VA denied compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for residuals of a gastrectomy performed in December 1992, including numbness in the lower extremities, as there is no competent medical evidence linking any current disability to the procedure.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an increased disability rating of 20 percent for his service-connected post-operative residuals of a fracture of the left femur with arthritis of the left hip, finding that further development was required due to the lack of evidence on which to base such a grant.
The Board has granted a rating of 20 percent for each foot's chronic Achilles tendinitis, effective as of the date of receipt of the claim.
The VA has determined that the appellant's service-connected residuals of a L-2 fracture and left clavicle fracture do not warrant evaluations higher than the current 20 percent and 10 percent ratings, respectively.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.