Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
The Veteran withdrew his appeal for payment or reimbursement of non-VA medical expenses incurred from May 6, 2019, through January 16, 2020.
The Board has dismissed the appeal as the AOJ administratively approved entitlement to payment of non-VA medical care provided from September 30, 2014, to October 2, 2014, and on October 14, 2014, October 21, 2014, and October 23, 2014.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for urinary incontinence, finding no current disability of urinary incontinence and no functional impairment to earning capacity.
The appeal is dismissed as the claim for payment of non-VA medical care provided on January 13, 2020, has been resolved by administrative action.
The Board has granted service connection for squamous cell carcinoma, finding that the Veteran's cancer is related to his in-service exposure to Agent Orange. The decision also acknowledges significant sun exposure during service and credible lay statements from the Veteran.
The Board denied a compensable rating for the Veteran's service-connected bilateral inguinal hernia with repair, finding that there was no evidence of recurrent or well-supported hernia.
Your previous claim for service connection for a neck condition was denied in May 2015. The Board dismissed your appeal because you did not submit the proper form to reconsider this issue.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for Female Sexual Arousal Disorder (FSAD) and Vaginismus is granted with an effective date of February 1, 2019. The grant of special monthly compensation based on loss of use of a creative organ is also granted with the same effective date.
The Board has denied service connection for left and right hand conditions due to a lack of current disability or symptoms. The issues of entitlement to service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, heart condition, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), left foot condition, and right foot condition are remanded as they are inextricably intertwined with the diabetes claim.
The Board denied the Veteran's requests for earlier effective dates for service connection of right and left foot trench foot based on clear and unmistakable error (CUE) in a July 1994 rating decision. The Board found that the evidence available at the time of the denial was sufficient to deny the claim, and there were no errors or changes in outcome due to CUE.
The Board has denied service connection for a skin condition, but remanded the issue of service connection for respiratory disability. The Veteran's skin condition claim was denied due to lack of current evidence, while his respiratory disability claim is pending and requires further examination.
The Veteran withdrew his appeal for service connection of a lung disability, and the Board dismissed the case as a result.
The Board has decided that the AOJ has not fully addressed the appellant's claim for survivor's benefits on behalf of her children, who are minors. The case is being remanded to adjudicate this issue.
The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the claim for service connection for left patellar tendonitis.
The Board dismissed the appeal regarding reimbursement of non-VA medical care provided to the Veteran on April 30, 2020. The appellant requested withdrawal of the appeal.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for additional medical opinions regarding the Veteran's eye disability, specifically whether it is secondary to service-connected ischemic heart disease or hypertension and related to TERA exposure.
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant, Anesthesia Consultants Medical Group, received care through the Veterans Community Care Program and was not paid for services provided on November 6, 2020. The process for billing under this program does not allow for review by the Board.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a heat stroke as there is no evidence of current disability or in-service event that could be linked to his claimed condition.
The Board denied the appellant's request for an extension of his educational benefits beyond November [REDACTED], 2021, as per VA regulations which state that transferred Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits cannot be paid beyond a child's 26th birthday.
The appeal was dismissed as the AOJ administratively approved payment for non-VA medical care provided on December 26, 2020.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.