Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
The Board has determined that the appellant's claim for VA payment or reimbursement of medical services provided to the Veteran on October 22, 2020 is timely and compliant with applicable regulations. The case is being remanded for further adjudication.
The appeal regarding the payment of non-VA medical services provided to the Veteran from November 3, 2019, to November 26, 2019, has been dismissed as the AOJ administratively approved the claim while this appeal was pending.
The Veteran's waiver of overpayment debt claim is remanded due to the AOJ not having sufficient evidence regarding her notification of her husband's death and the potential financial hardship caused by the recoupment. The Veteran needs to provide a Financial Status Report (FSR) and proof of her notification within 60 days.
The Veteran's appeals for extensions of disability ratings and initial disability ratings have been dismissed due to the Veteran's request for withdrawal.
The Veteran's adopted children were added to his VA disability compensation effective April 10, 2019. The Board found the evidence supported this earlier date and granted the request.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty-to-assist error and requires additional medical opinions regarding the Veteran's claimed hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
The Veteran's insomnia disorder is rated at 30 percent, and the Board has determined that it does not warrant a higher rating.
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to their death, and the claim for service connection for high blood pressure has been granted separately.
The Board denied the Veteran's appeal as the overpayment of $898.00 for a dependent spouse was proper and valid due to timely removal after divorce notification.
The Veteran is requesting that the July 16, 2010 rating decision be revised on the basis of clear and unmistakable error (CUE) regarding his syncope/passing out condition. The RO did not address this issue in their July 2021 decision.
The Board found that the Veteran and S.H. did not continuously cohabitate from their marriage until his death, leading to a denial of recognition as the surviving spouse for VA purposes.
The Veteran is granted an effective date of May 27, 2021 for a 10% rating for right elbow disability.,An earlier effective date for the separate ratings for limitation of right elbow and extension of forearm associated with right elbow disability is denied.,The Veteran's request for an earlier effective date for his 10% rating for right middle finger disability is also denied.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for retroactive payments of Dependents' Educational Assistance (DEA) benefits prior to March 16, 2020 as there is no legal basis for such payment.
The June 30, 1992 rating decision was revised to grant a 100 percent disability rating for panic disorder due to the Veteran's demonstrated inability to obtain or retain employment as a result of his service-connected condition.
The Board has decided to remand the claim of overpayment for further clarification and consideration due to incomplete information regarding the Veteran's coursework completion and mitigating circumstances.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for VA benefits due to his character of discharge from service, which was under dishonorable conditions.
The Veteran's child is already receiving the maximum DIC benefits allowed by law, and there is no basis to grant a higher rate based on military or government retiree status.
The Veteran did not have any unpaid VA benefits at the time of his death, and neither accrued benefits nor a survivor's pension are warranted due to income exceeding applicable maximum annual pension rates (MAPRs).
The Veteran's earlier effective date claims for TDIU and SMC based on housebound criteria are remanded due to the need to adjudicate his clear and unmistakable error (CUE) motions.
The Veteran's claim for TDIU was denied initially, but the RO granted it in an October 2022 rating decision effective December 7, 2018. The appellant is eligible to direct payment of attorney fees based on past-due benefits awarded.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.