Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
The Board has dismissed the appeal as it pertains to a contractual payment rate for medical services provided under a Veterans Care Agreement, and does not involve service connection or exposure to specific hazards.
The Veteran's spouse and child are granted a general apportionment of the Veteran's VA disability compensation benefits, with an amount equal to the dependency allowance for W. B. and D. B.
The Board has determined that the decision regarding eligibility for PCAFC benefits is legally inadequate and requires further review by the AOJ. The AOJ must provide proper notice of the decision as required by law, including identification of whether or not the claim meets the criteria under 38 U.S.C. § 1720G and 38 C.F.R. § 71.15-71.25. Additionally, a new medical determination is needed to evaluate the Veteran's need for personal care services, supervision, protection, and instruction.
The Board has granted service connection for a right foot disability, manifesting as right foot pain, finding that the evidence is at least evenly balanced in favor of the Veteran's claim. The decision resolves reasonable doubt in favor of the Veteran.
The appeal concerning entitlement to payment of the cost of non-VA medical services provided on February 22, 2020, has been dismissed as the issue was administratively resolved in favor of the appellant.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for accrued benefits as she did not file a claim within one year of the Veteran's death.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's squamous cell carcinoma of the left anterior true vocal cord is at least as likely as not related to in-service exposure to solvents, and thus service connection for this condition is granted.
The Veteran's blood clots in the chest and left leg are remanded for further development, including obtaining an addendum opinion to determine if they are related to service exposure to herbicides.
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient compliance with previous remand directives and the need for additional medical opinions.
The Board found that the Veteran did not have any of his claimed conditions present during or within one year after service, and there is no evidence to support a finding of exposure to ionizing radiation. Therefore, the claims for service connection were denied.
The Veteran's bilateral eye disability, diagnosed as dry eyes syndrome, chronic iritis, and glare sensitivity/photophobia, is remanded for further development. The Veteran also has a claim for an increased rating for diabetes insipidus and hypothyroidism which are both remanded.
The Board dismissed the appeals concerning waivers of overpayment of educational benefits in amounts ranging from $291.67 to $3,698.50 due to evidence that the Veteran withdrew during his college semester and VA restored his education benefits.
The appeal was dismissed as the claim for payment of non-VA care services provided on October 31, 2019 has been resolved administratively.
The Board has granted earlier effective dates of August 10, 2022 for the awards of service connection for heart valve replacement and supraventricular arrhythmia, special monthly compensation payable at the statutory housebound rate, and basic eligibility for Dependents' Educational Assistance under 38 U.S.C Chapter 35.
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for service connection for Inclusion Body Myositis (IBM) due to exposure to Agent Orange during his military service in Korea.
The Veteran's request for a waiver of overpayment debt is granted due to the creation of the overpayment being against equity and good conscience, considering the fault on both the part of the Veteran and VA, the Veteran's financial hardship, and the purpose of the benefits.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) should be remanded for a new VA examination to determine its nature and etiology, as the previous opinion was inadequate.
The Veteran's death was not service connected, and he did not meet the criteria for burial benefits as his estate funds were insufficient to cover expenses.
The Board denied the claim for payment of non-VA medical expenses incurred on January 21, 2021 due to a lack of VA authorization.
The appeal is dismissed as the VA has already resolved the issue of payment for non-VA medical services provided on February 14, 2020 by administratively approving the claim.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.