Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
The Board has determined that the June 2021 decision on appeal did not adequately consider the Veteran's eligibility for PCAFC benefits, and thus remands the case to allow for a new medical determination.
The appeal was dismissed as the AOJ administratively approved payment for the medical services provided on November 19, 2020.
The appeal was dismissed as the AOJ administratively reversed the denial and approved payment for non-VA medical services provided to the Veteran on May 10, 2020.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for colon cancer residuals is remanded due to the need for a VA examination and opinion regarding the relationship between his condition and Agent Orange exposure.
The appeal for payment of medical services provided by Navicent Health Oconee on March 28, 2019 was dismissed as the claim has been administratively approved and processed according to VA policy.
The Board has determined that the claim for payment of non-VA medical care provided by Boone County Health Center on January 16, 2021, should be remanded due to incomplete records and potential errors in decision-making.
The Board has determined that the eligibility decision for PCAFC benefits is legally inadequate and requires a new medical determination. The Veteran's personal care needs, as well as the appropriateness of participation in the program, need to be reassessed.
The Board dismissed the appeal as the issue of payment for non-VA medical care provided by Aegis Sciences Corporation on November 30, 2020 has been resolved in favor of the appellant through administrative action.
The Board has determined that the March 2021 CEAT review is legally inadequate to support the denial of benefits for eligibility in VA's PCAFC program. The decision did not provide sufficient reasoning or data to support its conclusion, and a new medical determination is needed.
The appeal regarding an earlier effective date for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death is dismissed as the March 2020 rating decision was subsumed by a February 2023 Board decision.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) benefits as she was not recognized as the surviving spouse of the Veteran.
The appeal is dismissed as the AOJ administratively approved the claim for payment of non-VA dental treatment services provided on August 11, 2020.
The Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for service connection and increased evaluations were denied.,Effective dates prior to November 5, 2019, for the grants of service connection for right hip limitation of flexion and left hip limitation of extension are not met.
The Board found that the overpayment of VA pension benefits was properly created due to the Veteran's receipt of Social Security Administration (SSA) income, and denied the appeal.
The appeal is denied as there was no VA authorization for the non-VA medical services provided by Aegis Sciences Corporation on January 4, 2021.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a lack of sufficient medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's celiac disease was caused by military service. The case will be returned for further evaluation.
The Board has determined that a remand is necessary to correct a pre-decisional duty to assist error regarding the eligibility for participation in VA's PCAFC program. The decision will be reconsidered with new medical opinions.
The Board has granted service connection for stomach cancer, finding that the Veteran's current condition is etiologically related to his active service. The decision resolves doubt in favor of the Veteran.
The Veteran's claim for service connection of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) was denied, and the Board found no evidence of an earlier effective date.
The Board has granted the appellant's request for an effective date of March 1, 2013, for the award of Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) benefits. The decision is based on the fact that the appellant's claim for burial benefits was construed as a claim for the cause of the Veteran's death, which should have been interpreted as a claim for DIC benefits.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.