Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
The Veteran's benefits are apportioned to the Appellant, on behalf of their minor child N.C., at a rate of 20 percent. The decision is based on the Veteran's failure to discharge his responsibility for supporting N.C. and the financial hardship faced by both parties.
The Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of medical expenses provided by Winchester Radiologists on October 17, 2022 is being remanded due to the AOJ not having considered all relevant evidence and failing to verify if other payment sources were exhausted.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to incomplete information regarding the Veteran's periods of service and their eligibility for Chapter 33 educational assistance benefits. The AOJ will need to clarify which periods of service are in question, request clarification from the DoD on the Veteran's active-duty status, obtain relevant DD Forms 214, and conduct an audit of the overpayment calculation.
The Board dismissed the claim as it pertains to the contractual payment rate for home health services provided under a Veterans Care Agreement (VCA) due to specific administrative dispute resolution procedures that do not allow for appellate review by the Board.
The Veteran's request for an extension of his delimiting date for Post-9/11 GI Bill educational assistance benefits was denied as none of the limited circumstances allowing for such an extension are applicable in this case.
The Board has determined that the appeal regarding the proper contractual payment rate for non-VA medical services provided from January 10, 2020 to January 31, 2020 is dismissed due to the specific administrative dispute resolution process under Veterans Care Agreements (VCAs).
The Board has dismissed the appeal as it does not have authority to review disputes related to contractual payment rates under Veterans Care Agreements (VCAs). The appellant's claim for additional payment is dismissed.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for eligibility to receive Chapter 1606 educational assistance benefits due to his service in the Army National Guard, which terminated his eligibility as of September 1, 1993. The Veteran had no active service with the Army Reserve that would have established eligibility.
The Board has dismissed the appeal because it does not have authority to review disputes related to Veterans Care Agreements (VCAs), which is a specific administrative dispute resolution process for non-VA medical services provided by Mennonite General Hospital.
The Board has dismissed the appeal as it pertains to a dispute regarding the contractual payment rate for home health services provided under a Veterans Care Agreement (VCA).
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for payment of $125.00 for medical expenses associated with COVID-19 testing performed by Aegis Sciences Corporation on January 18, 2021, as it found that a prudent layperson would have reasonably expected delay in seeking treatment to be hazardous due to the pandemic.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for left and right foot cold injury, other than degenerative joint disease of the first digit, and right and left lower extremity varicose veins are being remanded due to procedural errors in the decision-making process.
The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the service connection for a heel disability before the Board could make a decision.
The Veteran's diagnosed adenocarcinoma of the colon, status post resection of sigmoid colon, is related to his exposure to herbicide agents during service in Vietnam. The Board granted service connection for this condition based on presumptive service connection due to Agent Orange exposure.
The appeal is dismissed as the claim has been resolved in favor of the appellant and they are now receiving the benefits sought.
The appeal is dismissed because the medical services provided on January 11, 2020, are covered by a contract between VA and non-VA healthcare providers through the Veterans Community Care Program (VCCP). The Board does not have jurisdiction to review these claims.
The Board dismissed the appeal of the January 2016 rating decision regarding the assigned effective date for survivor's pension benefits as untimely and without valid grounds.
The Board has dismissed the appeal as it does not have authority to review disputes related to contractual payment rates under Veterans Care Agreements (VCAs).
The Board has dismissed the appeals as the AOJ administratively reversed the denials and approved payment for the non-VA medical services provided to the Veteran on December 13, 2020 and December 14, 2020.
The Board dismissed the appeal because the Veteran's drill pay for FY 2021 was properly withheld to recoup his VA compensation, and there were no allegations of errors in this decision.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.