Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
The Board has restored the Veteran's disability rating for mycosis fungoides from 100 percent to 60 percent, as the reduction was not proper due to clear and unmistakable error (CUE) in the March 2018 rating decision.
The Board has dismissed the appeal because the dispute over the contractual payment rate for home health services provided in March 2020 is subject to a specific administrative dispute resolution process that does not allow for appellate review by the Board.
The Board denied the Veteran's request for a waiver of recoupment of his separation pay, stating that there is no regulatory or statutory authority for such a waiver and that the issue of a waiver is inapplicable to the facts at bar.
The Veteran's fatigue and malaise are being remanded for further evaluation to determine if they are secondary to his service-connected obstructive sleep apnea and depression.
The Board has dismissed the appeal regarding the contractual payment rate for home health services provided by MGHAL to the Veteran from February 3, 2020, to February 27, 2020. The dispute is resolved under a Veterans Care Agreement (VCA) and does not allow for further administrative or judicial review.
The appeal for higher disability rating and earlier effective date for TDIU is dismissed due to the Veteran's death.
The Board has decided to remand the claim of service connection for sinus condition due to a lack of consideration of relevant medical records and an inaccurate factual premise in the initial decision. The Veteran's lay contentions must be considered, and further examination is needed.
The Board denied the Appellant's claim for recognition as the surviving spouse of the Veteran for purposes of receiving VA survivor benefits due to her divorce from the Veteran prior to his death.
The Board dismissed the appeal regarding the contractual payment rate for home health services provided by Mennonite General Hospital to a Veteran from February 11, 2020, through February 24, 2020. The dispute is governed by statutory and contractual authority that does not allow for Board review.
The Board denied service connection for arthritis, left foot pain, and right foot pain. The evidence did not support the Veteran's claims that his current conditions were related to his active military service.
The Board has found a pre-decisional duty to assist error and remanded the case for an adequate medical decision regarding eligibility for PCAFC benefits.
The Board denied the claim for attorney fees based on a May 2023 decision granting additional compensation for the Veteran's dependent spouse, finding that Appellant is not eligible due to the lack of a valid fee agreement and because the grant of benefits was not related to services provided before the initial decision.
The Board has determined that the VA examination and opinion regarding the Veteran's hairy cell leukemia are inadequate due to an inaccurate factual premise. The claim is being remanded for further action.
The Board has dismissed the appeal as there is no longer a case or controversy for decision due to VHA overturning its initial denial and approving the non-VA medical care provided by MSI on September 15, 2020.
The Board has granted service connection for the Veteran's chronic air sickness disorder, finding that it was incurred during his active service and continuing to present.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a lack of a VA medical opinion, and thus the claim for service connection for a right foot disorder is sent back for further examination.
The Veteran's claim for an initial rating greater than 30 percent for service-connected inguinal hernia was denied.,The Veteran's request for an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for inguinal hernia was also denied.
The appeal for service connection of a right hand disability has been dismissed as the Veteran's attorney withdrew the appeal prior to the scheduled hearing.
The Board has dismissed the appeal for payment of home health services due to a Veterans Care Agreement (VCA) dispute process that does not allow for review by the Board.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an effective date prior to January 1, 2021, for the award of a dependency allowance for his spouse due to insufficient evidence provided by the Veteran.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.