Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
The Board has determined that the November 2021 decision denying eligibility for PCAFC benefits is legally inadequate and requires further development to correct a pre-decisional duty to assist error.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for muscle pain, shortness of breath, and joint pain are being remanded due to the need for additional development regarding his exposure to experimental anti-nerve agent pills in preparation for deployment.
The Board found the debt valid and granted a waiver of overpayment, considering minimal fault on both the Veteran's part and VA's part in creating the overpayment. The decision also noted that repayment would cause undue hardship for the Veteran.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's gout of the bilateral feet is related to his military service and remanded for further examination and opinion.
The Veteran's claim for a higher disability rating for narcolepsy is being remanded due to the need for additional VA treatment records.
The Veteran's death was not due to a service-connected condition, and his remains were claimed by the spouse. Therefore, burial benefits in the form of transportation expenses are denied.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to predecisional error regarding the application of a retroactive compensation payment from the CRSC/CRDP program to reduce an overpayment debt. The Veteran was not provided adequate explanation for this action.
The Board found that the overpayment of VA compensation benefits was properly created due to the Veteran's failure to notify VA of his divorce from his spouse, resulting in an overpayment. The appeal is denied.
The Veteran seeks payment or reimbursement for beneficiary travel expenses for an episode of care on July 19, 2023. The VHA Beneficiary Travel department denied the claim due to a non-completed appointment at Texas Oncology. The Board is remanding the case to obtain updated VA treatment records and ensure proper notification.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the etiology of the Veteran's fatigue and shaking hands, which are claimed as residuals of malaria. The case will be returned for further development.
The appeal for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) is dismissed due to the Veteran's death during the pendency of the appeal.
The Veteran's death was due to prostate cancer, which is not service-connected. The Board finds that a list of the Veteran's service dates and duty locations, as well as a TERA memorandum on herbicide exposure, are needed.
The Veteran's death was not related to military service, and he did not receive VA compensation or pension benefits at the time of his death. The Board granted nonservice-connected burial benefits as per regulations.
The Veteran's appeal for VA payment or reimbursement of non-VA medical services received from February 7, 2020, through February 8, 2020 has been dismissed as the benefit sought by this appeal has already been granted.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to an error in determining the validity of the overpayment debt, specifically regarding when the Veteran's spouse was removed from his award and how this affected the overpayment.
The Board denied the Veteran's request for an earlier effective date of February 18, 2020, for the grant of service connection for esophageal spasm. The decision stated that since the claim was filed more than one year after separation from active service, the earliest effective date allowed under law is the date of receipt of the formal claim.
The Board has determined that it does not have jurisdiction to review the claim for a compensable evaluation for arthralgia, multiple joints because the initial decision was not properly adjudicated by the agency of original jurisdiction.
The Veteran's daughter applied for PCAFC benefits, but the Veteran died before final approval of participation in the program. As a result, no accrued benefits were due at his death.
The Veteran's appeal to the Board of Veterans' Appeals regarding the apportionment of his VA disability compensation on behalf of his minor children was dismissed because it was not filed within the required 60-day period after notification of the administrative decision.
The Board has granted a Level 2 stipend under the PCAFC for the Veteran's spouse, finding that he is unable to self-sustain in the community due to dementia and requires continuous supervision, protection, or instruction.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.