Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
The Veteran's eligibility for PCAFC benefits is being remanded due to inadequate notice in the initial determination and Level 1 Clinical Appeal.
The Board dismissed the appeal because a Summary of the Case for attorney fees was not issued yet, and thus there is no eligible decision to appeal.
The Board has decided to remand the eligibility for benefits under the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) due to errors in medical opinion and insufficient notice. The claim will be reviewed again with a new medical opinion addressing the criteria for eligibility as set forth by VA regulations, and proper notification will be provided.
Your claim for service connection for breast cancer has been granted, but the matter is dismissed as your appeal was resolved by a March 2022 rating decision that granted your claim.
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed as the representative withdrew it before a decision was made.
The Board has determined that the notification of the decision was legally inadequate and there is a pre-decisional duty to assist error. The claim for eligibility under VA's PCAFC program needs to be remanded for proper legal notice and an adequate medical decision.
The Board has remanded the case due to a duty to assist error regarding the Veteran's spouse's VA treatment records. The AOJ is required to obtain and associate any relevant records with the claims file.
The Board has determined that the notification of the decision was legally inadequate and there is a pre-decisional duty to assist error. The case is being remanded for an adequate medical decision.
The Veteran's claim for benefits under VA's Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers is remanded due to inadequate notice provided.
The Board has granted an earlier effective date of February 21, 2018 for the Veteran's entitlement to TDIU and Dependents' Educational Assistance based on permanent and total disability status. The decision is binding only with respect to these specific matters.
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for left leg amputation, ligament and muscle damage in left leg, and chronic heart failure due to a duty to assist error. The missing VA treatment records from the summer of 2018 are needed to properly assess these claims.
The appeal for restoring the Veteran's spouse as a dependent to his award of VA disability compensation, effective April 1, 2012, is dismissed as moot because the benefit sought on appeal has already been granted.
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn by the appellant, and thus the case is dismissed.
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for service connection and TDIU due to his carcinoid syndrome, as there were errors in developing the record regarding his claimed exposures and private treatment records. The Veteran is also required to undergo a VA examination.
Your previous claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 has been denied, and the Board is dismissing your appeal as it was already decided in a June 2023 decision.
The Board is remanding the case due to conflicting findings regarding whether the Appellant was married to the Veteran at the time of his death, which affects their eligibility for survivor's pension benefits.
The Veteran's appeal for an earlier effective date for the addition of his current wife to his VA disability compensation award is denied due to lack of proof of dependency status within one year of their marriage.
The Veteran's request for waiver of overpayment of nonservice-connected pension benefits was denied because it was untimely filed.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to inadequate medical opinions and need for clarification. The claims include sleep condition, fatigue, multiple joint and muscle pain, arm twitch condition, and hand twitch condition.
The Veteran's claims for an increased disability rating and higher level of SMC are being remanded due to the need for additional VA examinations and consideration of private treatment records.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.