Other conditions Board decisions

The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the reduction in his nonservice-connected pension benefits before a decision was made.

The Board has decided that the VA examination conducted in April 2023 is inadequate and requires an addendum to address the Veteran's lower back condition, including service treatment records from June 1983, August 1987, and November 1990.

The Board has granted an initial disability rating of 50 percent for the Veteran's service-connected adjustment disorder, finding that his symptoms most closely approximate those associated with a 50 percent disability rating.

The Board has remanded the case due to a need for an etiology opinion regarding the cause of atrial fibrillation, which is presumed to be related to herbicide exposure. The examiner should consider all toxic exposure risk activities, including TERA.

The Board has determined that additional development is needed for the Veteran's claims of service connection for upper and lower gastrointestinal disabilities, increased rating for residuals of appendectomy, and TDIU. The case will be remanded to obtain necessary medical opinions and updated employment information.

The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a skin disability, finding that there was no evidence of a nexus between his current condition and his military service. The Board noted that the Veteran had not reported any skin problems during service and that his symptoms did not manifest until many years after service.

The Board has dismissed the appeals for increased ratings for left hand disability and service connection for a foot condition, to include jungle rot, as the appellant wishes to withdraw these issues.

The Board has remanded the case due to errors in obtaining records and investigating a transfer slip. The appellant is seeking an earlier effective date for DIC benefits.

The Veteran's daughter, T.B., is denied recognition as a helpless child due to insufficient evidence showing she was permanently incapable of self-support prior to her 18th birthday.

The Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a right inguinal hernia was denied because he failed to report for a necessary VA examination, and there is no evidence of good cause provided.

The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for multiple myeloma and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia due to potential exposure to ionizing radiation during service. The claims will be reviewed with consideration of all applicable regulations, including those related to presumptive service connection under the PACT Act.

The Veteran's death was not caused by a service-connected disability and there is no evidence of herbicide exposure in Vietnam. Therefore, the cause of his death cannot be considered service connected.

The Board dismissed the appeal regarding a higher disability rating for patella femoral syndrome of the right knee prior to April 25, 2022.

The Board has decided to remand the cases due to concerns about possible worsening of the Veteran's psychiatric and right foot disabilities since their last examination in 2020. The cases are now sent back for further evaluation.

The Board denied the appellant's claim for recognition as the Veteran's surviving spouse, finding that their marriage was not valid due to a legal impediment and thus did not meet the requirements for VA benefits.

The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for neurological symptoms and an increased rating for a left knee strain due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the etiology of these conditions.

The Veteran is seeking reimbursement for non-VA medical services obtained at North Mississippi Medical Center from September 8, 2006 to September 11, 2006. The Board has ordered the VA to reconstruct his claims file due to missing documents.

The Board has dismissed the appeal as the appellant withdrew it, and there are no specific errors of fact or law to review.

The Board has decided that the special apportionment of VA benefits to J. A., the Veteran's spouse, was not properly made and has ordered a remand for compliance with contested claim procedures.

The Board has remanded the case due to outstanding treatment records that are relevant to the TDIU claim. The Veteran is required to provide information about any additional medical records, and VA will attempt to obtain them.