Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DismissedSeptember 2023
The appeal for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities has been dismissed because the Veteran died during the pendency of the appeal.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2023
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his right thumb trigger finger and tenosynovitis is remanded due to the need for a new VA examination to assess the current severity of his disability, including any functional impairment.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2023
The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for a rectal perforation with resulting perineal abscess and sepsis, finding that the complications were not proximately caused by VA's carelessness or negligence.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2023
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for essential tremor, finding that his diagnosis did not qualify as Parkinson's disease and thus could not be presumed due to herbicide exposure. The Board also found no evidence of direct causation.
- Whole decision: DismissedSeptember 2023
The Veteran withdrew his appeal before the Board could make a decision.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2023
The Board found that the overpayment of educational assistance benefits under Post-9/11 GI Bill for on-the-job training was due to administrative error and granted the appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2023
The Veteran's death was caused by esophageal cancer, which the VA does not consider to be related to his service or any exposure to herbicide agents. The Board also found that there is no evidence of negligence on the part of the VA in diagnosing and treating the Veteran's esophageal cancer.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2023
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection and compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to insufficient evidence showing that his right eye disorder was caused by or aggravated by VA treatment, including the December 2015 YAG capsulotomy.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2023
The Board has remanded the case due to additional evidence being generated and not reviewed in the previous Supplemental Statement of the Case. The Veteran requested that his case be returned to the AOJ for review.
- Whole decision: DismissedSeptember 2023
The Veteran's claims for higher ratings for right knee disability have been dismissed as the issues are moot due to prior grants of service connection.,The Board has remanded the cases regarding entitlement to a TDIU and rating in excess of 10 percent for right knee degenerative arthritis during the period prior to January 5, 2016, and residuals of right knee total knee arthroplasty.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2023
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine the nature and etiology of any musculoskeletal or muscle injuries, as well as their relationship to service-connected disabilities. The Veteran will need a VA examination to address these issues.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2023
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether the Veteran's service-connected disabilities caused or aggravated his obesity, which in turn may have contributed to his umbilical/abdominal hernia.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2023
The Board has found that there has not been substantial compliance with the most recent remand and additional development is required. Specifically, VA was to request records from treatment provider S.B., but did not do so using the correct street address on Stelton Road.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2023
The Board has remanded the cases of fatigue and atypical chest pain due to inadequate compliance with previous remand directives. The Veteran's service includes deployment to Southwest Asia, which qualifies her for presumptive toxic exposure.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2023
The Veteran's service connection claim for multiple myeloma is granted due to exposure at Camp Lejeune, including MCAS New River. The appeal is successful as the criteria for presumptive service connection are met.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2023
The Board has denied service connection for Female Sexual Dysfunction and remanded the cases of MDD evaluation and TDIU due to service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2023
The Board denied the veteran's claim for nonservice-connected pension benefits because he did not have active military service during a period of war, and thus, his claim is denied as a matter of law.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2023
The Board has determined that the apportionment decisions need to be remanded due to procedural errors and for further evidence collection.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2023
The Veteran's cancer of the larynx, status post radiation, with chronic laryngitis/hoarseness and xerostomia/dysphagia/swallowing difficulty is granted a disability rating of 30 percent on and after June 1, 2016.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2023
The Board has granted service connection for stroke residuals as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected hypertension, finding that the evidence is in equipoise and supports a finding that her hypertension was a cause of her stroke.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.