Other conditions Board decisions

The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate opinion regarding whether the Veteran's right leg disability is related to his service-connected frostbite residuals.

The Board has remanded the case to refer the Veteran's claim for an extraschedular TDIU prior to March 22, 2010 to the Director of the Compensation Service under the provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 4.16(b).

The Board dismissed the appeal because the appellant requested to withdraw it.

The Board has remanded the claims for unspecified trauma and stressor related disorder and TDIU due to incomplete development, specifically not issuing a Supplemental Statement of the Case (SSOC).

The Board has remanded the claim for a compensable rating for left varicocele due to insufficient examination and compliance with previous remand directives.

The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding whether the Veteran's prostate condition, including benign prostate hypertrophy and as related to herbicide exposure, is service-connected. The VA needs to provide an addendum opinion from a clinician.

The Veteran's death was not caused by a service-connected disability, and the Appellant does not qualify for DIC, pension, or accrued benefits due to her age and lack of financial dependency. The claim for burial benefits is denied as untimely.

The Veteran's RLS is rated as a severe disability, resulting in a 30% rating for the entire period on appeal.

The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination and new evidence is needed for a proper evaluation of the Veteran's service-connected left third toe disability.

The Veteran's right hip replacement disability is rated at 50 percent for the period between November 1, 2015 to January 20, 2021. The Board found that his symptoms did not warrant a higher rating as they were considered moderately severe.

The Board has remanded the case due to outstanding records from Social Security Administration and private treatment records. The decision is not about service connection.

The Veteran's daughter A. is granted additional compensation as a dependent school child from August 14, 2005 to August 23, 2009.,The Veteran's stepdaughter Bri. is granted additional compensation as a dependent school child from June 1, 2007 to January 17, 2011.

The Veteran's cause of death was listed as cardiac arrest, with respiratory and cerebrovascular arrests contributing to his death. The Board denied service connection for the cause of death due to insufficient evidence linking any condition to service or presumptive exposure to herbicides.

The Board has determined that the Veteran's frequent urination was not incurred in service, caused by or aggravated by a service-connected disability, and is not related to herbicide exposure. The claim for service connection for frequent urination is therefore denied.

The Veteran's left femoral nerve palsy, resulting from a prostatectomy in August 2009, is considered an additional disability caused by VA medical treatment and not due to negligence. The Board granted compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for this condition.

The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for a medical examination to determine if the Veteran's Raynaud's Syndrome is related to his service, particularly in cold weather areas.

The Board has remanded the case for further development due to inadequate medical opinions and confusion regarding the Appellant's claims. The Veteran died of end stage liver disease, which may have been caused or aggravated by his service-connected schizophrenia.

The Veteran's left shoulder disability, characterized by impingement syndrome, was found to not warrant a higher than 20 percent rating under the applicable diagnostic codes.

The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a lung condition, finding that there was no evidence of an in-service injury or disease and no link to asbestos exposure. The decision also noted that the Veteran did not provide information regarding his claimed asbestos exposure.

The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed due to their death. The Board does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this case.