Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2020
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for service connection for atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rhythm due to insufficient evidence and a need for further examination.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2020
The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the validity of an overpayment concerning the removal of his former spouse from his award.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2020
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's heart disorders are related to his service, including presumed exposure to Agent Orange.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2020
The Veteran's initial ratings for balance impairment, bradykinesia or slowed motion, tremors and muscle rigidity of the left upper extremity, right upper extremity, left lower extremity, and right lower extremity have been granted at 50%, 40%, 30%, and 30% respectively since September 2, 2014.,The decision does not specify any exposure basis or indicate the use of a presumption like PACT Act/Agent Orange/Camp Lejeune.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2020
The VA denied service connection for Raynaud's disease because there is no current or in-service diagnosis of the condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2020
The Board denied service connection for rash on the left and right leg, finding no evidence that it is related to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2020
The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for a VA examination and consideration of multiple diagnostic codes.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2020
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for additional evidence and/or further examination. The case will be considered again after obtaining more information.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2020
The Veteran's MDS related AML is granted as service connection due to herbicide agent exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2020
The Veteran's service-connected spasmodic dysphonia did not manifest with thickening or nodules of cords, polyps, submucous infiltration or pre-malignant changes. Therefore, the claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent was denied.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2020
The appeal is dismissed due to the death of the appellant.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2020
The claim is remanded because the appellant was unable to start her education earlier due to a psychiatric disability with panic attacks, and VA needs to obtain medical records from health care providers who treated her for this condition.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2020
The Board dismissed the appeal for a compensable evaluation for bilateral hearing loss due to the appellant's death.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2020
The Board denied the claim for non-service-connected death pension benefits because the appellant's income exceeded the maximum annual pension rate (MAPR).
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2020
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate medical opinions and missing consent forms. The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 is being reviewed again with additional development.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2020
The Board denied the Veteran's request for a waiver of an overpayment of VA non-service connected pension benefits due to fault on his part and undue hardship caused by continued repayment, finding that joint fault existed between the Veteran and VA in creating the debt.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2020
The Board has determined that the appellant can be recognized as the Veteran's surviving spouse for purposes of VA benefits.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2020
The Veteran's current skin disability, diagnosed as sebaceous cysts, was initially manifested during active service and is etiologically related to service. The Board found that the evidence is in relative equipoise regarding establishing a nexus to service, thus granting service connection for the condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2020
The Board denied service connection for a right hip disorder as there is no current evidence of the condition and it was not caused by service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2020
The Veteran's prostate cancer is not service connected due to lack of herbicide exposure during his active duty in Korea, and there is no evidence of a direct link between the condition and service.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.