Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's pension is already at the maximum allowable rate due to his zero income, and thus no additional benefits can be awarded. The claim is dismissed as moot.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · January 2020
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease was denied as the earliest possible effective date is October 15, 2016 due to the liberalizing law and retroactive application.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2020
The Board has dismissed the Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for the grant of special monthly compensation (SMC) as it lacks jurisdiction to decide this issue.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2020
The appeal was dismissed due to the appellant's death, and no jurisdiction remains for further consideration.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for a VA examination to assess the severity of his service-connected left Achilles tendonitis, as the previous examinations did not adequately address functional loss during flare-ups.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's claim for service connection for Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma was received on September 30, 2015. The Board granted an earlier effective date of September 30, 2015, based on the presumption that exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune caused his cancer.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's appeal is dismissed due to his death, and the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this case.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the cause of the Veteran's colon cancer and his service-connected condition. The VA will need to verify exposure to toxic substances, including herbicides, and review the etiology of the colon cancer.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his death, and the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this appeal.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to their passing away during the pendency of the appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2020
The Board denied the appellant's request to reinstate her apportionment of the Veteran’s VA benefits, as she is no longer eligible due to their divorce.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete development and will consider all evidence before issuing a new decision.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2020
The appeal for the cause of the Veteran's death is dismissed due to his death during the pendency of the appeal.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2020
The Board has granted an apportionment of the Veteran's VA disability compensation benefits in the amount of $900.00 per month to the appellant, who is the Veteran's spouse.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's service-connected unspecified trauma and stressor-related disorder was granted based on a stressor that occurred during active duty, as reported by the Veteran.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2020
The Board denied the appellant's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. §§ 1805 and 1815 for a child born with spina bifida or covered birth defects, as he does not have spina bifida and his mother is not a Vietnam veteran who had covered service in Korea.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Veteran's son, D.D., is claimed to be a helpless child due to permanent incapacity for self-support prior to reaching the age of 18. The VA needs to obtain records from the Department of Defense regarding any disability benefits or incapacity determination made for D.D.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate medical opinion regarding the cause of the Veteran's bilateral upper extremity disability. The Veteran is asked to provide information about any outstanding private treatment records and VA treatment records are requested for review.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2020
The Board found that the appellant did not serve in active duty, ACDUTRA, INACDUTRA, federalized service, or full-time duty with the National Guard. Therefore, he is not considered a veteran for VA benefits purposes.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the etiology of the Veteran's right little finger deformity, specifically whether it is related to service or a post-service injury. The case will be returned for further examination and opinion.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.