Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records and inadequate examination, requiring further development including obtaining private treatment records and scheduling a VA examination with an oncologist.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for a VA examination and additional development of records. The case will be reconsidered after these steps are completed.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Veteran's active service does not meet the criteria for VA death pension benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The appellant's service with the Merchant Marines was after August 15, 1945, and he is not eligible for VA compensation or pension benefits.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2015
The Veteran's right great toe arthritis has been rated at 20 percent disabling since July 7, 2008. The most recent VA examination in January 2011 showed moderate limitation of motion and no evidence of severe impairment.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2015
The Board found that the appellant's request for waiver of recovery of an overpayment debt of VA educational benefits in the amount of $7,877.55 was timely filed and the appeal as to this issue is allowed. The validity of the overpayment of VA educational benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill in the amount of $7,877.55 is also found valid.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to the agency of original jurisdiction (AOJ) due to insufficient evidence regarding his active duty service period. The AOJ will verify the Veteran's service periods with the appropriate service department and then readjudicate the claim for educational assistance benefits under Chapter 33.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Veteran's claim for compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 is being remanded due to insufficient evidence in order to properly adjudicate the claim, specifically a medical opinion.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Board found no current neurological disorders of the upper or lower extremities and concluded that any such conditions are not related to service-connected spine disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Board has remanded the case for an addendum opinion from a VA examiner to address whether the Veteran's bilateral foot condition is related to or caused by his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II and/or peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2015
The Board granted an earlier effective date of May 5, 2007 for the grant of service connection for a mood disorder.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for polymyositis, finding that there is no causal relationship between his current diagnosis and active duty service.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Board found that the apportionment of the Veteran's VA compensation benefits, effective from October 2009, was not improper and denied the Veteran's appeal.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate reasons and bases in concluding that VA had met its duties to assist and notify the claimant. The appellant was not advised of alternative means to obtain service treatment records, which were destroyed in a fire.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Board has determined that the submitted evidence is not new and material, thus denying the appellant's petition to reopen his claim for nonservice-connected VA pension benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Board has determined that a Statement of the Case (SOC) was not issued for the appellant's disagreement with the effective date of the apportionment award. The case is therefore being remanded to issue an SOC and ensure proper contested claim procedures are followed.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Board found that the preponderance of evidence does not support a finding that the Veteran's left lower extremity disorder is related to his active service or his service-connected right lower extremity disability, and therefore denied the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Veteran's dysthymic disorder with adjustment disorder has been rated as 30 percent disabling prior to February 20, 2013 and as 70 percent disabling from that date. The appeal is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2015
The Board has determined that the Veteran's deviated septum was incurred in service and granted service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2015
The Board has granted a 10 percent rating for myositis and costochondritis of the left rib cage, muscle group XXI, and an increased rating to 30 percent for tinea versicolor. The Veteran's service-connected conditions are found to meet the criteria for these ratings based on their severity.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.