Other conditions Board decisions
239,517 indexed Board decisions for Other conditions.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2015
The Board found new and material evidence to reopen the claim for service connection for a low back disability, but denied the claims for right and left knee disabilities due to lack of relevant medical evidence. The Veteran's current lumbago was not related to her military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2015
The Board has determined that the appellant's income exceeded the maximum annual pension rate (MAPR) of $7,933 as of July 1, 2011, and thus termination of non-service-connected death pension benefits was proper.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2015
The Board has determined that the Veteran's countable income exceeds the maximum annual disability pension limit set by law, but his need for aid and attendance is established. The case is being remanded to conduct an audit of unreimbursed medical expenses and income calculations.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2015
The appellant's enrollment for the Spring 2013 term at the Community College of Philadelphia did not meet the requirement for full-time status, and therefore he is not entitled to payment of Dependents' Educational Assistance (DEA) benefits at the full time attendance rate.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2015
The Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of private medical expenses for services performed at Munroe Regional Medical Center on February 8, 2013 is denied as the treatment was not for an emergency condition and VA facilities were feasibly available.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2015
The appeal is being remanded due to issues related to the effective dates for apportionment of the Veteran's VA disability benefits for his spouse and the reduction of his VA disability benefits. The case must be adjudicated again after resolving these issues.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2015
The Veteran's claim for payment of unauthorized medical expenses was denied because they had coverage under Medicare Parts A and B, which constitutes a legal bar to reimbursement.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2015
The Board found that the evidence was in equipoise and granted service connection for adenocarcinoma, finding it likely related to herbicide exposure during service.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJuly 2015
The Veteran's claim for a higher initial disability rating for postoperative residuals of pilonidal cystectomy was denied. The appeal regarding the effective date and whether there was CUE in the December 7, 1999 decision is pending.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2015
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral patellofemoral pain syndrome has been rated at 10 percent for each knee. The Board found that the limitation of motion caused by the disability warrants a noncompensable rating in both knees, but did not disturb the already assigned 10 percent ratings based on complaints of pain and additional functional loss.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2015
The Board has remanded the case due to issues with TDIU and a VA Aid and Attendance examination. The claim for SMC based on aid and attendance or at the housebound rate is inextricably intertwined with the entitlement to a TDIU.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2015
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral eye disability is secondary to his service-connected hypertension and has granted service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2015
The Board found that the Veteran's hyperintense brain lesions are not a disability and thus do not warrant service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2015
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for higher ratings for residuals of bilateral mandible fractures and bilateral renal cysts, finding that the evidence did not support a rating in excess of 10 percent for the mandible fractures or any compensable rating for the renal cysts.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2015
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for issuance of a statement of the case regarding the propriety of the effective date for apportionment of the Veteran's VA disability benefits to his spouse.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2015
The Board found that the Veteran's death was not caused by VA's failure to diagnose and treat his preexisting conditions, but rather by an underlying infection.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2015
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral deep venous insufficiency is not related to his active service, and therefore denied his claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2015
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for issuance of a statement of the case regarding the effective dates for apportionment of VA disability benefits to the Veteran's spouse and reduction of his own VA disability benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2015
The Board finds that the Veteran's arthritis of the hands did not manifest during service and is not related to his service-connected traumatic arthritis of the lumbar spine, left and right thumbs. Therefore, service connection for arthritis of the hands is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2015
The Board previously found that the February 1997 rating decision granting service connection for cough/shortness of breath as due to undiagnosed illness, status post uvuloplasty was clearly and unmistakably erroneous. However, the parties agreed the evidence is ambiguous on whether the Veteran's claimed respiratory disorder developed on active duty. The Board concludes that the original grant of service connection was not clearly and unmistakably erroneous and restores service connection for this disability.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.